Everything could be seen so certain in having our all perception with eyes, ears, nose, or so.
But that thing is based on our undoubtful trustbto our perceiving organs, thus if we have skeptical feeling to all those things, how can  we have certain trust to our perceptive judging. 

Though, even if we doubt our own perception, we can have dlubt to all percieving view or that appearance and wecan believe our own judging including our skeptical conjecture to all perceiving appearance, then we can have conviction only to our presuming, infering our mind itself, thus on the contrary, if we can have doubt to our own mind itself as never so sane, we would lose every trust to own mind as seen so main subject to convince us that we are normally think and move with sane function, but if we have an idea, just an ability to have a view of skepticism, if we can confirm us in which we have doubtful emotion, only what we are insane could be never doubtful fact, that contradiction would catch us in wander, how  we can cotrol our wanting truth and its estimating subject in balance and consistency to convince our mind, eventually all questions could return to first start of question.

Then, after all we would be obliged to conclude that if we can have everything solved in no doubt and no contradiction, what we should never have unnecessary question, more than we need for securing reality in stability, we would come up with the idea, and eventually, we would give up all questionably curious consideration, but if that descision in lazy looking over to everything, our society, this is the pomitical scene, but as far as concerned to our own personality, we would stop all doubt and suspiious mind at least to our own personality, then in conclusion, all these questionable process would be invalidated to nothing.

Though, actualy, substantially, these our uncouncious stance implicitly winking at all questionable items as mind issue is our conventional habit and thinking usage.

That viciuos circle would never be solved everlastingly.
At last, we would be obliged to be controlled with external power, that typical example is political corruption, with any field of society, we can witness in real life.

In other words, all our annoyably unsolved issues are belonging to this contradiction, in this analysis, no discernment to categorize between internally immanent our mind and externaly realized in substantial pictured state as social modus ponens or politically and economically appearing or advent.

And these issues are deducted only to our cognitional arbitrary judgement in discernment around what idea we should have in mind, and how we should regard it reliable, in other words, how we should just regard all of standard, norm, or criterion as a fixed absolute it or sort of instantly expedient and interim finger or so in judcing. In other words, this question could nevet be solved everlastingly, eventually we'd know only its immovable truth.

However, although we hold so unsolved it, how we can keep our reason sane and certainly brightened, all our mindset must depend on only it.

That proposition must be over and beyond all practically practiced matter, just it relies only on our immanent certainty, not meant measurable. (to be continued)
(May. 29th. 2020)