The most important thing is what mind is capable to correct any kind of perceptive organ's malfunction, coz even if we age, and get senility to perceive so correct nor minute images with eye's physiological vision in malfunction, we can correct it as regarding all sight's real perceived image as malfunctioned caused from senility mobilizing our own memory when all eyes' sight was working ordinarily, in other words, as long as our mind can correct sight's doing meaning, even if we lose ordinary capability of visually perception, we could never lose mind's perception itself.

This thing evidences us that our percetion means us we are given being perceived, as physiologically, but according to getting aged and senile in never ordinary functioned perception, only mind can correct it regarding that perceived images we can accept as malfunctioned, then our mind can be said as being capable to perceive, not being perceived with our reason, in other words, what we accept in all perception means that our mind can grasp and understand what our mind can take from really realized image through our organs belonging to our body, then with our correcting mind toward our disabled percption, we can understand correct perceived things meaning. 
That must be our mind's subjective function and its correction evidences our mind reason and our consciousness to understand our perception's meaning.

All what we perceive around externally perceived things means that our mind switches all external developped things to our internally interpreted them.

Thus even if our physiologicly functioning perception is superior, what makes us in mind which can correct malfunctioned perceived images into ordinary functioned it in mind is our memory and our mind's presumption. That thing could never work if only our mind's unconsiousness is mobilized, thus in conclusion, what can correct senility driving malfunctioned images is ourmind's measuring reason and our mind's will and intention, and these things belong to our reasonable consciousness.

Previously interpretted all is our mind' relevance and reciprocity toward really perceived sight as mentally realized thing to us as our mind, and what can mobilize us correct all malfunctioned image we accept physiologically is our mind and what it can mobilize correctiimon to mind perception, not internal organ e.g. eyes in our certain consciousness. Then necessarily all the other perception with auditory sense, sense of smell, sense of temparature to our body with skin or so can be dealt with as the same example in this subject.

This controrvercy evidences us that our reason is mobilized with our consciousness and either consciousness is mobilized with reason, and either identity which judges or presumes that our mind would be in malfunctioned and possibly, and presumably would be managed by insanity must be ourreason, and its mobilizing consciousness, hence both what DesCartes claimed and Freud claimed must never be false, both theories were right, and just we can coordinate both things in revised view in synthesis.
And necessarily synthesis is made of our mind reason, it should never dare to be mentioned.
(to be continued)

(May. 30th. 2020)