God as the great Generator must be extranally absolute Lord, but we must have God in mind, that must mean that only when we believe in God, we could see His idea, then we must be brought about to be one of partner to absolute entity as God.

Our spontaneous and subjective internally immanent dialogue to God makes us externally God, it is never our objectively observing external perception. Only it gives us a ascertained dialogue to really tangible voice of God.

That stance at some extent stands at Judaism, but at Messhia demanding Christianity.
Islamism could be transformed formulation from Judaism.

We all are carnally bound presence in world.
Certainly God must be a dialogue partner toward, but that confronting must turn it to accord, because believing in our own belief means believing in God as dialogue partner, but it could never be polemic debate partner, but substentially the inner our conscientious voice because just we can believe in our own conscience so absolutely we can believe in God, as meant generation Lord and ethically absolute Lord at trinity.

At this debate, probably so many theolests must have so close idea, so personally. 

In other words, if we regard all things as externally, these are either knternally perceptive, and all extentional conceptual definition must mean just intentional idea, because our skin, musle membrane must not only shield any kind of external things, but also contain any kind of external things turned to necessarily internal ones.

(to be continued)
(Oct. 1th. 2020)