Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Triplism's Suggestion Part10

Time itself's cognition must be made with our notinal understanding, and its understanding must be made with our observant consciousness to all things accompanied with time.


And, necessarily, we can have cognition to time itself, only through our mutual communication as conversation, talking or so.


Communication must need subject meant as talking content, and also our mind holding our communicative capability. It has very instinctive and autonmous element and either very personally emottional and subjective decisive element. Necessarily it holds either will and intention. Our communicative capability must have had us understood, conscious to time, and its transiting. Cognition to time has both time's transiting motion itself with our observant cognition to all changing aspect to each thing, and another is just our synthecizing mind driving wholly totalized time's system from past to, through now, future, and its introspective round trip with arbitrary mind. These process must be necessary to our life.


And un expectedly very important fact to us is that only past must be immortal in terms of notion. Notion must mean immortal at least at the extent of our expediency.
Then, principlly, to only past, we all can have mutually absolute consensus. Because only past factual recorded items could never be impacted by anything, necessarily now and future.


At least to occurred matters, we could never change nor switch substence, excpet to our notion or intepretation e.g. as significance to one past fact has generally or so.


Past facts, thus just absolutely immovable.


Then, only to past, we all can be publicly recognizable and have absolute consensus.
Jesus's birth at 1century December 25th, New York Wall Street stock crash as depression and recession, otherwise, expiration of world war second at 1945.


On the contray to it, we can say and have so subjectively each divided notion with wish, hope, expectation, or so only to future.


Only future must be uncertain and now is consistently kept by our all expedient consensus. Necessarily that notion is relevant with Heidegger's Sorge(as German means anxiety in English).


                                                                         ❄


Then so far, we consequently could display next diagram as our integral propositional summary compsed with former mentioned all discription. 




Notionally had conseusus Only to Past.
Factual relevance's immortality unless this universe has disappeared.


    〇          Upper position means Superiority at Consensus
 Past                                 Publicly unchangeable as recorded immortality
                                            (since universe's end)
    〇    〇
    Now   Future


Simultaneously, we hold together the anxiety to future, but its aspect is according to each one's mind, so arbitrarily and unchangeably so subjectively accord only to past with every other one. Not only it but also either to future we have a mind arbitrarily and consistently with each occasional aspect's switching.
These things mean degree of concern in  mind of us.





          〇       Privately to each, personal fact and condition


〇    〇 ↗ Future
Past   Now   




However, we must deal with future accompanying uncertainty in our own anxiety, then as well as past has, we must make future that certainty, there we set object, aim and target. Necessarily it would be succsessful otherwise at setback. But its aspect is another dimensioned to this case.


      〇        Privately simultaneously Publicly 
     Now ↖
 〇        〇
 Past     Future


Then only Ⅲ means next diagram, so struly and substentially.



As nothion held at our own mind and future prospect in synthesis
     〇  〇    〇 〇
      ↘  ↘  ↙ ↙
       
                                  〇
At this moment, we all have shared consiousness in terms of practice, as  Privately simultaneously Publicly in complition, in other words, that must be our society and language activity.


In terms of philosophy since nowadays, essetially any philosopher must have had only discerning public notion and each personal mind. However, from now on, we should notice or make us noticed to that we have only publicly and necessarily we anytime have very privately admittable notion and understand publicly emoboied all with publicity, and necessarily we anytime have very privately personal concern and consciousness with hope, wish, anticipation and anxiety or care. 
However, except two of them, we either have very obvious mind to make us have accord to all publicly acknowledged factual truth and very privately public mindset and introspective mind, necessarily these things make us motivated hope and object to the future.
But, originally philosophy scene must have neglected them and this consistently has left this proposition only to economics, sosiology and epistemology or anthropology or so.
That thing could be seen caused from God's time given to us, as John McTaggart's time theory with his papers. This is just phylosophy holding long eras convention as notinonal idea's usage. 
But, at Heidegger, God's time must have switched to future anxiety as Sorge, of which concept must be caused from our all having uncertainty at future all occurrence.
Then, if we adopt his idea to contemporary society, we should take our own steady desision to assimilate us with group, or generally public consensus as these days for fighting or confronting new corona virus or so. 
At the matter of fact, many philosophers might have been holding thier privillege that only they could analyze time system so along with God's providence, but they either had circle and gathered at confference and their own priviledge was owned by them, thereby necessarily they either from the beginning, subsoncsiously had agreed or either evidenced my suggesting Ⅲ's idea as they either admitted to public notion only philosophers could have, then they were never so exceptional to us as ordinary citizens in society or world in terms of philosophic notion .


(to be con tinued)


Jan. 22th. 2021


Memorandum; The next chance to debate must be about our acting motion and time's length our mind catches and its time nature mechanism.