Russell's paradox occidentally consequently followed Fraenkel set theory by Zermelo could be convincingly interpreted with or very usuefl accosiation to mind issue. Eventually for calling our own"mind" mind so definitively, we necessarily and substantially need at each time or consistently certain object to conceive with our all bodily organs. 
Frankly, mind needs externally exisiting all beings as being present of any materials, phenomena, or so. And in terms of our daily using mathemetics' principle ordinarily neglects our mind itself as integral element to elucidate, because ordinarily it intends to output numerical value as index of practically dealing anything for reffering at data correspondence.
However, its the way to compose the order of mathematics must make contradictory reality in whic any gap of practical economic activity's failure and stock price's own not damaged value rising, and that reality must make many foctors to jeopadize many people in world now at new corona virus pandmic crisis.
Then, daringly, to mathemarics with which we usually use any kind of computer system, with dualism as realized with binary. Actually to these contradictory gap deal, generally any programmer is grappeling with any kind of statistical data inputtingnan and each time, occasional revision must be guided to computer system, but probably it could have capably limitation to output the most approreiate revision to all social asapect embodying modus ponens, then to algorithm itself, we should reform or give some proper reformative indication, for it, we must be necessary to have third dimensional recognition for making any computer known to that order. 

For meeting its purpuse, we need so integrally advantageous several theories to this debating site, just for meeting it, I need some steady term to research and inspect, then after a few term while, we must meet togehter again at this series' subsequent Part16. 

(to be continued, irregularily to next debate chance)

Jan. 30th. 2021

Memorandum; If we summarize this debating series, at the matter of fact, the uncertainty principle(in terms of quantum mechanics by Werner Heisenberg) evidencing viewers view in uncertainty must correspond to our debate suggesting mind and viewed object at his uncertainty principle must correspond to time itself. 
In conclusion, I just apply these things for some elusidation to revise dualism with Heisenberg's the most famous theory to Heidegger's ek－sisten or so with his vital concepts, ek－sisten just means our daily notice to any object to be observed or perceived. 
by the way, really Heidegger was influenced with Heisenberg at meeting of Todtnauberg moutain villas, afterward, that must be some fetal meeting together, we can imagine so easily.

Additional Note; By the way, now perceptive our mind as indicative capable it must mean both consciousness to somewhat externally to our observational all things or internally to our own things as memory, remiscence as in introspection or so. Then mind could be defined as all items' including synthecized notion with consciousness, notice in interest, concern, observing with notice, otherwise memory and anticipatory, expectable prospect, presumptive aspect and thinking capability or so. 

https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:482608/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Time as Ek-stasis
and Trace of the Other
hans ruin

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/158301888.pdf
HEIDEGGER’S AUTHENTICITY
BY
DEREK ROBERT O’CONNELL