Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Verb’s Function Part1

Just  we could define first around verb usage like next summary.


Transitive verb. 
To other object, person, namely, how any material or phenomenon, occurrence, at the matter of fact, any kind of generating thing as what takes place at any time or so, as these things and to person, how anybody is working on as an idea to person, otherwise how we can have relevance to peple, or particular individual person or so, all these could be adopted to be used. And these items' usage is usually at description, informing speech and sentences, and objective analysis. Very typically used with third person, and second person, as in questioning, claiming, or so.


Meanwhile, 


Intransitive verb.
Very almost cases are just for person's decision, informing speech and sentences as confession, explanation to personal thing, or so, daily generally explainable thing to other ones, thus, these vi. using message means so personal at least at first person's mentioning order, but simultaneously to generally cognitive object, just plain intepreting, observing any matter and thing in subjectively moves, changes, act, being making act or so. Necessarily these used cases includes material, nature phenomenon, and mentioner's own, personal thing's informing.



Next grammer structure could be adopted to transitive verb. 


SVOO


SVOC


However, at usage of intransitive verb, verb itself could be used as help for modification to mentioned thing. Except verb, that systematized sentence could use adverb and noun as basic structure, only for modification adjective is used, and its nature around our usage proves adjective's addtiionally attendant and concomitant nature. Anyway, we could interpret so appropriately that vt's function is generally making S's externally relevant all things' relation and functioning, and objectively assessed and recognizable position, interepretation and understanding to us.
In other words, vt's usage's feature is based on relatively to vi's usage, only so remarkably objectively regarded so clear mentioning's object case could be used so freqiuently, at our daily use by and large.


Then, necessarily we could say that vt's usage could make clear explanation to S and its all concerned and relevant itmes in totalized informing, and when we need at conversation,speech or informing, reporting, that kinf of clearized explanation and these integral aimed cases could adopt vt's usage so frequently.


Meanwhile, vi's usage is done at particularly so simple act explanation as subjective narration and speech and confessive informing as personal item and talking subjective mode and at an option of selecting talked content and totalized subject.


Anyway, verb usage is at any case so for informing move and change of aspect at mentioned thing in one sentence. With its basis, we can add adjective and adverb to the structural basis of sentence.
And what we shold mention here is relatively to vt's usage, vi's usage could be opted only for mentioning not so publicly necessary case or not so formalized necessary informing, reporting, on the contrary, even if we need explanation to our thing as personal circumstance's explanation and talking for getting some personal permission, casatively meant intention could be hardly applied by us usually, if that fact is to some extent so convncing, vi's usage consciousness is belonging to so personally approaching stretegical consciousness driving effect, and that thing necessarily means that subjective mentioning act means not dependent on success or not at informing or reporting. And that fact must prove that at objectively data reffering act in informing and reporting, we need only objectively analyzed and statistically considerable mentioning form is demanded, then necessarily vt's usage as typically well explaining with relevance with informer, reporter and informed, reported items in clearizing, That mentioning act has success and not it in consequent gap, relatively to vi's mentioning driving leaving either uncertainty, that must consist in only certain doing as nature of commnication.


Then, if we take all these analyzed truths, we could conclude that vi usage must mean being on basis of first person's informing and confessing nature, and vt usage must mean being on basis on third person's informing and reporting nature. Even if both could be used at second person, former is characterized with first person nature mentioning, latter is done with third person nature mentioning. Otherwise, at vt used at content about first person, that could be objectively analyzed tasty, and vi used at content about third person, that could be objectively simply analyzed picuture and aspect describing taste could be done.


Then, very roughly analyzed truth, it could be, but as typically intending implicative teste could be applied here, vt consciousness means more objectively mentioned picuture and aspect in analyzed and observational with meta-cognition, and so analyzed in cool introspective mentioning. Meanwhile, vi consciousness means more subjectively pictured confessional narration, and frankly natural talking, then that is not meta-cognitive, but so simply talking one's subjective mind, idea are easily done to listner. Then, that is not so deeply analyzed and not so intentionally objective, just naturally subjectively mentioned tedency is so strong.


With these all interpreted truth, we could certainly conclude that verb's two typed usages depends on and consists in verb using ones as talking and speaking one's postion to heard one, That usage in discernment but with necessarily to the third person both typed attitudes could have objectively considerable mentioning, but just only frank and provate conversation as not offcial talk and very fromally set offcially publicly necessary talk with negotiation and confference or so are each configulated at any occasion. 
And the last interpreted truth could evidence eventually either verb's usage consistently reliant with verbs' user's personal option and it showing necessary mentioning one's mind at intentional stance and socially subjectively conscious stance as idea around position to all mentioned facts by the one.
And that nature must impact verbs users' cognition, recognition and interpretation to all around verb usage opting one's idea and habit to output the one's idea, and social stance at talking, reporting, informing everything so publicly and personally. Necessarily mentioning act at each occasion with each distinct case must impact verb user's consciousness and daily life creed, or so too.
(to be continued)



May. 24th.  2021