Our social any consensus could be one momentary expedient tacit agreement not to quest mutually than minimal necessity. Because any itme could be inspected so precisely, any socially necessary operation could have prefect malfunction and just only deadlock or stmubled crisis.

At the matter of fact, at any word, actually anyone except each one as myself could never confirm that one word we usually use could be used also by any other one through the same meaning e. g. a word, love, responsibility, kindness, justice, or any other word, because even if we could have so smooth commnication through these words, otherwise each one just expediently mutually admit the words conversation partner uses regarding them as the same meaning is applied for the present, but essentially truly mutually gotten consensus could be just fromally and arbitrarily held pretending to get mutual acord, probably mutual mind's truly meant mind's understanding could have some not embedded gap together.

Nevertheless, if we have at each moment have so excessive skepticism at mutual understanding, our given time is limited and that pursue is limitless, hten consequently we regard them all as for the present the matter under control, at our tacit consensus.

At this aspect, in terms of our reality at daily our cognitive picture, our using words' meaning is universally so arbitrary. At the matter of fact, every words' meaning's consensus, it could rely on not only words' definition but also conversation participants' mutually tacitly known consensus, and its effective term is very fragilly limited, nevertheless, we can easily revise each gap around lingering never to have asscertained conclusion, then anyway, the most important matter is not only dependent o formally set definitive regard each word has, rather our mutually focusing subject with these words could be the most integral.

Probably every philosopher could regard these realities as so offcially displayable diagram or so. But poets, or novelists next of poets could do them as so complicated and never reachably consensus's absence in nihilistic view or so, but these are either so emotionally hestening mind too, rahter more cooler intepretation at good meaning must be necessary at debating these gaps.

If somebody who writes poetry at this theme could be known to that truth with many evidenceable realities, the one must have so detached and so skeptic idea around general people's idea, and thought around justice, and generally seemed trustworthy orthosox ideas. 
Nevertheless, their these attitude is not so appropriate at proceeding this so tough mind issue for us. Because that nature is not only negative factor but also so irresistible very cardinary idea we could never eliminate forever, so probably.

In other words, we could never forsake that our daily felt contradictory reality's nature, namely these are irresistible force and our never regarded neglectful our mind's principle to anyone.In other words again, any poet, novelist, essayst could have some unrealized ideal form at our communication as the method to practice so universalily, but that thing must be perfect default, because our idea is anytime accompanied with slide rule. 
It could never mean that all communication is just relative, not that truth, rather we have mind's slide rule at checking mutual gap and pursuit of sympathized elements and understandable findings. 

If we interpret so substantially at our daily communication, only skeptic and nihilistic idea displaying attitude is rahter so extreme optimistic stanced acts. Because the kind of attitude needs so reliant orthdox, but essentially that ideal orthdox as the idea by itself must be so opptunistic and easily optimistic idea, because all these are from the beginning, only fantasy or illusion. Our posture we should apply is more flexible and versatile it, it must be recognizable switchable fundamental course.

Eventually, we need to admit our mutual mind's meanness and cunny nature from the beginning, because we all are liking only so easy understanding at any case, that our mind's laziness is what we must admit and watch so carefully together. Onr mind consistetly need easy method and want to evade so complicated procedure, but its presence is absolutely demanded and very necessary.

As first mindset, we need to recognize that we all are easily dragged at very easy way for dealing with anything, that our so evil-minded nature must be gazed at our mind's watchful eyes. 

In fact, we so subconsciously take our words so advantageous method to utilize only for getting so selfish satisfaction, with so egoistic excuse, we usually easily execute that so sneaky nature only for getting ease only for us so personally.

We certainly use any mean excuse only for ascribing any sin with another one, and taking irresponsible domain for protecting our mind and position with selfish safetynet. In other words, we all are prone to justify any kind of tactful cleverness only for our own advantage, and that mind must have perfect absence at having charity and pity. And that act could be done so unconsciously and so frequently.

By the way, if we take our reality just what is realized as it should be done, actually that mind could never be taken so rarely, we unconsicously are obliged to just obey all customary idea and conventional not considred so deeply just acknowleged by social habit, but once we'd guide some questionable mind and idea to these realities, very parasoxically we'd find some so cheaper fiction we'd for the present concluded so proper, but so many reformable elements could be found by now our taking care. If that idea could come up to our own mind, we'd have another idea, that must be necessity to switch them so radically and daringly have them all in so appropriate skepticism. 
Because our reality could be isnpected with multi-angled observation, very many problematically claiming elements could be discovered so easily for anyone.

All that necessity could be promoted and done so well only relying on our so tactful(at good meaning)picturing in mind, with so proper skeptic eyes at having introspection to all what we'd have done so arbitrarily, and these things could rely on our past conventionm commonsense and those days' realities, and now is essentially very remote to those days already.

If the kind of our multi-angled eyes so properly could be held at our necessary inspection, we could have positive hope to revise all so questionably unnecessary habitual usage in our daily days' life. Being active at revising all our stepped footprint means so much, if we consistently admit only already realized reality, that our mind's stance could be only giving up our mind's pursuit at switching hope's content and dimension.

If we have some certain belief to life as the own thingn to us so universally, we'd regard our usage of our given words as already establidhed principle and orthosox as the untatchable to us, that only formulated offcially and formally order could be one of our spirit's worn nature's generating only expediently embodied falsehood.
Because our immanently holding promised land could be held by only steady belief never giving up our mind's picturing things.

Then, if we want to make our really realized reality approachable to our mind picturing, necessarily that our hope must accompany so strictly inspecting to all picturing thing's appropriateness, anyway, only that thing could be done so well, we'd approach our reality as it just is, we should never abandon all our mind's scheme as the most credibly regarded by us all.

For getting it done, we should be and need to be more positive believer, not so nagative one, to our mind's hope, and that things' necessity, because if we hold some skepticism at really realized realities, that must be what we should respond these realities' necessity to be revised at waiting for our really embodied approach. 
And if we catch truly meant our minds' sharable picturing modus ponens, our words' usage we usually apply could get more suitable aspect, and really realiized aspect to ideally revised our picturing in mind. At the moment, we could use our words so usefully and mutually we could confirm sharably used each word's meaning and truly signified indentity. The kind of our communication must be trustworthy to all of us, at least amongst only ones who beleive in our sharable reality with true realization of our subjective effort so mutually working on any chance.

In other words, our truly meaningful words' definition is not given at no condition, according to our appropriate subjective effort, it could be owned by us so subjectively.
If these things could be embodied by us, so honestly, we'd use our words not at dimension to get only flattery nor pretending to anyone so necessarily, and if we regard it as so tacit consensus, relatively to it, we could abandon all so substantially motivated mind, so unnecessarily, then we should never insert the kind of skepticism to what we essentially aquire and obtain required conditioned all, we should never have any skepoicism only to it. probalbly it must be our absolutely correct reason, you know, anybody in the world for us!
(to be continued)

May. 10, 27th.   2021