〇If we suppose that time has memorized all natural history (Universe history) in no prejudiced to any incidents so subjectively, all beings with materials(mineral) and organic matters would be defied as nothing but an evil, coz they each aren’t able to be just fair in no exceptional specialized as each partial thing, being itself is either evil field, we could say, also with these matters, for example human individual’s memory has at any one’s case individual distinction, toward the same matter for anyone, it would accompanied with dispersion, and individual difference, either at one person, more unforgettable things and forgettable things in gap must have popped up at anybody, so naturally.
However, for time, it would be so necessary from the beginning.
If it was different, we would find the absolute contradiction.

〇On the other hand, if time itself would be completely never so fiar with subjective prejudice, intelligent life creature individual in all beings (this case means welt-in-zein or da-zein) in each different disperted, cos being individual means each distinct, and these gathered sumup must be shown, namely not only all da-zeins’ memory content’s averaged sumup but also namelyall data are fairer, substantially time kind of thing we are naturally prejudiced that it has no mind as if God does as if He must never be similar to our own mind, it must be so necessary, so as we are apt to be with that kind of premise, thus we with it engage in natural science.

For example, with these processes, we would anytime have statistical sumups at our usually daily days.

However, we have that premise in our that kind of judging which is caused from our absolute credible as we reard as being so called absolute fairness.
Thus, if we express on the contrary to that truth, eventually we must never be evidence that time itself must be so perfect fair to anything nor no-individually subjective.

Cus, it must be impossible, and we are all known to it, thus we compose all logics for example natural scientific ones either, with just that premise.

At the matter of fact, thiat manner is a kind of our habitual routine, or idea holding propensity, as if we either had set God as concept for us to argue about many things, paraphrasing it, it would be implicit decision making’s way we anytime have setting so similar to former mentinoning implicit premise, we could say so.
(to be continued)

(Jun. 15, 16th. 2019)