According to one theory, Bertland Russell’s important text, The Analysis of Mind’s Ⅸ Memory has a sentence tasted preface, so famous World’s created five minutes ago, but it attracts only Japanese philosophers, as the attractive proposition to them, for the time being, let’s neglect any question which is truth or false, extract only its sentence.

In investigating memory-beliefs, there are certain points which must be borne in mind. In the first place, everything constituting a memory-belief is happening now, not in that past time to which the belief is said to refer. It is not logically necessary to the existence of a memory-belief that the event remembered should have occurred, or even that the past should have existed at all. There is no logical impossibility in the hypothesis that the world sprang into being five minutes ago, exactly as it then was, with a population that “remembered” a wholly unreal past. There is no logically necessary connection between events at different times; therefore nothing that is happening now or will happen in the future can disprove the hypothesis that the world began five minutes ago. Hence the occurrences which are called knowledge of the past are logically independent of the past; they are wholly analysable into present contents, which might, theoretically,
be just what they are even if no past had existed.
（Bertland Russell, The Analysis of Mind London George Allen and Unwin, 1921. 　ⅨMemory）

Toward its sentence, Japanese philosopher, Hitoshi Nagai mentioned its propositional content with his explanation at his text “ Myself, Now and God” (Watashi, Ima sosite Kami－Kodansha-Gakujutsu-Sinsho＜私・今そして神＞講談社学術新書)　as showing next.

As the condition to be present of memory’s belief, the fact really could have been occring of memorized incident would never be necessary in logical term. Otherwise even the past must never had been present. World itself just first was given a birth to this reality, five minutes ago, as the condition at five minutes before, including the ones who can remember the past but actually did never exist, five minute ago, it at the first time was given a birth to its reality, all these local idea’s possibility must be feasible, as the supposition’s condition to be set so necessarily. Between the incident at a particular moment and nother it, logically so necessary contacting relation must never be found to us, thus now as present or future incident would never become the suppositive rebuttal, neither. Thus, present occurring incident so called as the knowledge about the past would never be connected with any real past incident, so independently.

A kind of knowledge could be analyzed only to the present so completely, even if the past itself might have been absent perfectly, the knowledge about the past itself could be logically composed so necessarily, theoretically as the feasibility.
(Nagai’s sentence)

But, either as Shigeki Noya and Yoshimichi Nakajima either took its Russell’s this propositive sentence, if all those attempts are correct so suppositively, it means the justice only concenered with analytical philosophy’s proposition, coz that theory would be suitable only to notinal argument, realistically means the other matter.
Because if former supposition may have been applied to the other developed supposition at the world which was given a birth to the reality, there would never be present of any possibility to be thought our own death, the incidental feasibility at our future, so quickly being vanished with its strange supposition, in addition to it, from the beginning to us as each one, the meaning to be given a self memory as being myself must be invalidated finally, from the birth, growth, and death, what we anybody have self memory as an independent individual one inlife cycle birth and death in turn would neither be invalidated, and moreover the meaning gotten only after the process with birth, growth and death would be done, as realistic context accompanied could be seen to us, we can judge them all in substantialism argument.

In other words, if five minutes ago the world was popped up to be real, synchlonically fake memory either was implanted to us, at just the truth, obviously we could never be responding to its reality why we have been accompanied with the necessity to have each own memory in question and answer, it’s another developed impossibility invoking supposition.

The reason we are obliged to have own memory at each mind is caused from that we must survive at a so degreed length spending in witnessing all days’ passings. Meanwhile, at the world in which we could never experience so degreed duration at usually spent our life span, we might have never holding any need to be with memory as each different, and either the necessity to be born as independent individual with memory.

Memorized facts must have never been set with momentary and so shortened temporally necessity to have a reminiscence its flashing them, I would answer in substantialistic vision for the present.

In other words, Russell just only attempted to show its sentence for us to be made so clear to the substantialistic meaning of memory, we can infer so.
This ironical paradox would be tried to stock itself so meant only with the condition in which we could see former shown viewpoint so natural, probably the all philosophers except in Japan might have been thinking so, either.

〇By the way, our own memory in other words, never be each dintinct private it, but whole ones’ them summed up with each distinct all are just realized so partially by picked up from time’s memory met by itself in no prejudiced mind and no unfair viewing stance with perfection to be met as whole memory to whole universe matters, so we could say.
But, if all suppositions are reverse, time itself must check whole memories of us as our historical viewing legacy as time systematic chain records and we must have never done any inqury and observation to the natural world just being dependent only on our memory each of us privately has.
But really as I explained at former sentences, all are contrary. We by ourselves examine on a basis making the earth as the object to be examined by us with universe and nature itself either.

〇Being able to remember something means being able to forget some matters so temporarily and having something never be remembered forever either.

However, its truth must never be adopted to time, its trial must be contradictory.
Its reason must be satisfied with that except being and nothing, another half being and half nothing must be unable to be met to us, we can say.
By the way, all chained matters with life births must belong to in beings’ each occurring.
(to be continued)
（Jun. 24th. 2019）

Note; next twice I would try the summup of this series in developing new phase of them.