If we look at everything only so extentional, would it be so logical or so the fact kind of the thing as the presence only need or is needed to be as to be so, or if we recognize everything as being individual in each intentional, must it be so looking at something only with being to be so?

For example, connotation to the words is so the thing to be explicated to be customary only with ruled or conventional in usage, but denotation would be so individually in lookin way as so describing itself as so objective, would it be either so concentrated consciousness we can establish? How should we grip all those things in the truth we should set so initially?

Either to world itself, if we see it just world itself, it might have been so independently to all other things to world itself but synchlonocally we would be noticed to that that understood world would be just only extentionally seen it, only we just switch our own viewing form or so, would we see its trying so really but would it be just personal arrival?

Idenyifying itself as just genuinely only being so may have been another explanation to itself, or so kind of so fecund productive concentration to itself as being so, coz strong closing approach means so another consciousness to all the other habitually tracing acts and so customary cognitive routine to us, we could explicate it either, but for example toward the words, if we use them only as words themselves, its way to face them must be the way to metaphysical cognition and so the way to make much of only functional strategic explanation and the thought or a little unique idea that only objective and cooler discernment should be applied or adopted to words as one typically exemplified indipendentaly individual matter or item through the words themeseves.

After all, we might have been able to conclude that only seeing one things as just private or alone thing but its explication must be assorted in seeing it so objective in wholly perspective way to look at or either in seeing it so simply isolated concentrating viewing only to mono matter, or so just one thing, eventually or so in conclusion, we could be able to see it possibly if we see it with reflecting way to the past just passed away a just second ago, or so, namely we can see it in two ways with seeing only it in sole concentrating and seeing it with seeing content and consciousness to seeing itself as taking it into widened perspective, and both two things to be recognized are so easily confused in our contemplating them usually only in so easy explanation, thus we must be interested in switching way to our seeing acts in simply seeing content, as experiencing tangible fatual it and seeing acting itself in our all surviving and alive things to us, and we can easily switch our thinking and focusing way in an idea or consideration, and its so fun reality must give us an important lesson around our consciousness and perception and physiologic response we’ve indigenously inherited so unexceptionaly to anyone.
(to be continued)

(July15th. 2019)