Seeing myself could never be so objective, but usually when we think of human kindness or so at general view, or even toward calmed own mind when we question, mutually we can be so objective and cool to see everything, thus we can say that these two mind thinking characters are mutually contrary.

But what brings about its conclusion?
Why are we think so intuitively?

Generally speaking, we can judge that however even someone is so cooler in judging everything as to be objective view holder, the one must never be so to just only the one’s myself.
That truth must have a reason that when we think of externally confirmable truth, wen can easily compare any kinds of situation and examples but toward myself, only myself-wise view could never be seen so objective for anyone, and in terms of own private past things we’ve experienced and witnessed and suffered, we could never be compare to other all things never connected with myself.
This asymmetry means so much, thus when we listen to our own voice recorded with some devise, and when we can look at myself as appearing to externally all the other ones except myself with mirror, out own feeling and perceiving way can never be objective, and it must be in so hard gap between immanently thinking and its objective it.
Real perception must change our own impression to myself.
Now examples are all externally seen things to me, but past things about myself directly we can remember is either never what we can make them in objective comparison easily.

Human can be so modest only to seeing myself in things and matters, coz we can easily imagine what impression other all ones except myself could have to me, but toward all the other ones we usually could never have any shyness, or shame as if we usually have only to myself around them.
Their appearance is already obvious either to us with me, but only myself is completely different.
Thus, usually even so cooler ones are either unexceptional to its truth, we could say so.

Ordinarily that truth must have never thought so crucial, but as my idea, its proposition must be involved with mirror reflecting mirror image or relation with left and right.

In other words, eventually partially to myself, nobody could never be objective, only to myself nervous emotion must be included by myself, but the same thing must never be set to any other third person to myself, thus originally we all are never so careful to other one’s appearance.

This issue is so important but ordinarily in philosophy, being shameful, shy or sort of mentality must never be debated completely. Because usually philosophy attempts to debate truth as if mathematics persist in axiom or theorem, but its matter or sort of proposition could never be connected with truth, coz for philosophy truth means absolutely evidential in explicative analysis as logically correct, thus philosophy itself insists on words’ structure and its meaning as the most evidential appearance of our intrinsic truth, but mirror image issue must be involved with mathematics, and our shame or shyness in emotional issue must be involved with mirror image theory and its truth.

In other words, in terms of our human relation with myself, yourself and third person in social relation must be involved with mirror image theory deriving truth and generally it must be regarded as psychological issue until nowadays, it’d be false with my view.

As so ultimately decisive truth, even so never subjective anybody can have shyness and shame, then necessarily its issue is so particularly crucial for myself, with survival strategical vision since the birth of Homo-Sapiens.

Anybody is never so consistently objective only to myself, anybody even if the one is usually so cooler than any other one, the one was positioned to be claimed to that oneself, the one must never be in absolute objectiveness, that is human’s evidence.

It must be absolute condition to be a human, as absolute truth, probably for survival for any individual. But its reality must be shared to anybody, no exceptional being must never be discovered.

At this truth, it’s so private issue but simultaneously so public issue. And it must be the issue of reality for surviving.

Hence, if take care of its truth and noticed to it so enough paying attention to it either, anybody can be so modest, thus in conclusion, we can never provoke intrusive acts to any other ones except myself, and we are obliged to have some stubborn blockage never making us to be so modest mutually, but that thing must be unnecessary vanity, anybody could be aware of it so clearly if the one is so ordinarily reasonable character, thus on the contrary to its thing, if we discover the one who can never understand and imagine the other one’s shyness or shame, that one must be insanely mental diseased, because we know that anybody in public must never be felt in myself shame, even if the one has that sort of emotion internally to the one, but we are never so, with these facts, absolutely we can be kind and gentle e.g. a player as actor or actress, or musician, or singer appears in front of us on stage, if they are so nervous, we can easily cheer up them from the bottom of our heart, that act must be applied to any other spots we usually have, if somebody could never be able to it, that one could be regarded to be mentally diseased with particular reason as some traumatic past incident for the one, we should contact the one so gently.
(to be continued)

(Jan. 15, 20th. 2020)