Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Around Alternative by Civilization Part2 How Strongly can Individual Mind be Present?

We all feel something at anytime we face so privately, but at this situation, we always are noticed to what myself must be made of society, people, ethnicity, culture, language, and age as personal life length and era or epoch as environment for all presenting surviving people as citizenn.


In other words, the individual which can be distanced to them all  now I discribed must be impossible to preset, that is typically inescapable condition to us, even if we are in social distance bound sktuation nowadays, probably its thing must never be altered nor vanished in human world.
Namely, individual as word has meaning that all conditions suuround our own body and mind which make any individual feel in se sation, tangibility, cognition, or any perception.
All these are the things which identify us and make our idea or character, sensibity, and sensitibity. Evetually al these co,ditions are consistently making our identification to be myself and its certain consciousness.


In other words, only notional myself could never be present nor have any meaning.


We first physically are just real materialistic body and its thing constantly is located at concrete whereabout, that conditioned facts are so really and practically concrete and never being abstruct.


Although we frequently feel that either myself must be the sole thing in world, particularly when we privately feel isolation, through having neglection by other ones, or specificly by someone around myself.


But that feeling must be applied to now our situation as we must take distance and never gather.


In fact, so frequently social consciousness is made by inertia as lazy conservatism anybody can compose implicitly together with all other members in wanting only doing job, in no asking essential question. Very many members of society are agreeing that all social activities should be done, so convetionally, even not so few members have some 
simple question in having discontent.


But if some so certain reformation has to be needed to work or so, very drastic and so severe endurance must be forced to any member, in front of this unavoidable condition, any individual power is futilly ineffective.
Thus nobody is apt to accept easy change so straightly. Then eventually, almost members are apt to decide any submission around questioned thing as unsolved contradictory social issue, or sort of enigma to which social almost members have and have consensus in needing to pursue for solution.


But at this situation, if some radical idea having one submits the question around its reality, with an idea that its reality is so lazy that we should review the reality, that honest opinion must be neglected with conservative idea that all unnecessary ideas  could ripple the social conscience and stability, eventually that suggestion would be seen and regarded as anarchily dangerous, that thing evidences that all unexpected transmitted opinion could never persuade many ones in society, ordinarily, that kind one's social credibility .ust be set in regard of common sense, frol the beginning, all disgusting opinion is apt to be eliminated by seen so normal idea all ones implicitly agree unconsciouly never sustained with logical interpretation.


After alo, to the one who showed his or her question to the society must be given so cold blaim and critical punishment to suppress the one's idea.In conclusion, the kind of suggestion could be left only to critics, novwlist or sort of fairy tale creators.


Though, meanwhile we all are in so distinctive situation to any past eras, as given reality in which we can easily transmit all our own  opinion to any individual, not only same nationalities but also any other national identified ones beyond all borders, thus substantially, we already have gotten any chance to contt any sort of indivudual person, so personally, that reality must be secured with our habit to use own terminal. 
Simultaneously that fact means that we all have personally own location in survival, and its conditioned fact provides us the reality we could regard all our own residential whereabout as crossroad, in no regard of number of getting chance of meeting to foreigner in frequency to be with us, personally. 


Certainly, smartphone owning reality promptes us have easy transition in communicating with anybody in no regard of mutual whereabout, that reality works so effectively and advatageously to commerce, trade, and business, and either political message transmitted to all over the world. In other words, we now can easily have and show own opinion to anybody, in no complicated procedure so officially, of course, its reality easily makes ochlocratic opinion's easily pandemic state producing society's mood whole over the world, but that tendency must never be wiped out from this global community for us, eventually at a rate we are destined with surving along with that kind of irreplaceable reality, thus we should debate all issues in having this unchangeably constantly accompanying reality as the fundamental premise, that is probably, even if we feel so sorry to it, we could never switch wholly to world, but of course, that thing should be debated by us, either.


Very many information is created and transmitted to any corner of this earth, that content is universally widened also with political idea not only national issue but also any foreign country. That absolutely free choice of subject rather makes conservative idea holders to suppress these seen so dangerous ideas from this globe, after all, copehensively persuasive authorized regulatory ideas with international law, and spontaneously our holding stoically regulating self controlling spirit together, that development must make us so cautious to any next staying one, with neighboring ones, strangers, passersby and in addition to all anonymous real face unseen internet using citizens.  (to be continued)


Memo:Today's issue is apllied to any conditioned circumstanced issues in our society, necessarily not only our now confronting virus crisis but also completely differentiated conditioned term to us with now our facing reality. Even in this so critical crisis, we should debate or cotrovert together so universal propossitional issues, either.
(Feb.13th., May. 24th. 2020)