〇God is never belonging to being. Because it must mean only the one who created the ones as beings in zero as nothing.
Atheism composing motivation means criticism to theism, but it must have false of what they could regared God as one of beinmg, although, if God is one of being, being itself as reason to be and cause to be must have contradiction. Simultaneously if being renerated spontaneusly generated, all units as all elements as material in genesis would have no consistenct\y, so logically.

〇What generated being must never be told by being’s range as propositional premise, so absolutely and logically. Then God is transcending being itself, and He or It is the sole presence to transcend Himself or Itself. By the way, if we regard God as personal God or not, that must be have no gap, because we all are conscious creature and it means even if we regard God as personal or not, that gap means nothing, in other words, in premise that we regard God as the absolute for us, because the ones who could regard God as absolute are only us, thus, if we define God so personal God or do Him or It never personal God. that diffrence must never mean anything, so logically.

The most vital factual truth is only what we regard God as the absolute and the sole.

〇Numeber is not being. Number is a kind of absolute sign as semiologically, logically, mathematically. through setting the premise that it could be objected only for us as being which understands language, then number is absolute language.
However, that is not everyday language, then, it could never be suitable for our everyday usage as our daily communication.

〇Then, number is atorney of God and prophet, or the Saviour in prediction or expectation.

〇Otherwise, birds would have another their own attorney or sort of Savior for them only they could understand, as well as our number. Necessarily that would their God’s attorney, but if we admit is so, even insects, gems, viruses are either having these things, we could say.
However, the number which could grasp whole totality could be impossible to them.
But because of those truths, world means multiple or kind of plural.
Though only the earth environment makes them possible

If it was the truth, presumably only biological or ecology could have all physics or mathematics in having many paradoxes as contradictory unsolved things solved.
To physics, only mathematics can offer the understanding principle. In its system, possibly only biologically and ecologically number could solve e.g. Riemann hypothesis.
Of course, for the time being, it is unsolved thing to us, and presumably in period we’d survived in the earth, that solution could have been impossible.

〇Why I think so is caused from that actually if we understand the whole universal mechanism toward the universe or being, it must mean mimic the view of God in supopositiona as external visional supposition, however, we could never becom birds, insects, plants, in other words, even we are only one of the creature, and it means having only narrowed view as well as them as other all species in the earth.
(to be continued)

(Aug. 17th. 2020)

Note; this time trial means definitive no contradiction between Judaism and Christianity in compatibility. Just left issue to us is only what we could everlastingly have a view only for us, and we could never have it of insects, birds, plants or so, that very restricted absolute truth around the view holding must have the most integral key or clue to understand newly found phase of us in academic standpoint.