If you want to be a good writer, and you think first that being so needs so regular life cycle and healthy bodily and spiritually conditioned days' spending, however, someday, you'd be awaked to that good job at sentence creating is not always according to best condition to be ready for addressing, never yet, very gloomy feeling day or very bad bodily conditioned day caused from continuous insomniac nights' accumulation, that sorts of day, out of the blue, very wonderful work would be produced, then eventually, very ideally conditioned coordination might have not be so integral, and that thing is unexpectedly universal, then we are apt to conclude that any appropriate model case or role models we could learn is very commonplace expedient example, and that is only suggesting summary. 

Very interesting example exists at other domain. Words "run of the mill' means not only very ordinary or kind of everyday, but also means very hard disciplene. Eventually all words' or vocabulary meaning is at each occasion, so arbitrary, then share holder could be meant a part of stakeholder, but simultaneously stock holder as a vocabulary would be added to them, very complicated relevance would be made, that either means UK. and US in usage, or so and rigidly fixed definition would be impossible, we could say so, then very many logicians, analytical philosophers and linguists are apt to submit the proposition, in taking paradox of the heap, that means the category of heap is very ambiguous, because it has no border between one grain or so and heap, but actually we usually are never so consciously discerning all cases toward heap and not it, in arbitrary judging, according to case by case discernment.

Thus, we can associate these very subtle issues with racial discrimination, recently repititiously took place at Freedom Respecting country, but these subtle issues could never be interpreted for all not party concerned, eventually these very sensitive issue would be understood only by party concerned, and additionally, anytime we should take notice to that all even, all perfectional arbitation must be impossible, because everybody is never on perfectly fair view holding position, interratial marriage couples are consistently so partial, and if we arbitrarily found absolutely even country, that country's reality must be horrible communism, with cold blooded bureaucrats' managing, and either, we could say, if we intentionally all marriage was forcibly interratially done, certainly at a short time, perfectly ideally neutral hybrid ones must occupy that testing country, but afterward its condition must trun to divided assorted combination, that has already been evidenced by evolutional Bawldwin effect, as atavism or so must generate, then perfectly even, neutral condition could never be met so arbitrarily.

Certainly if we try to solve all issues with racial, ethnical, religeous, and gender gap driving very miserable incidental occurence would anytime suggest us that with these entangled crisis, we might have been exterminated, but probably actually, anytime partially we would be at hem of it, but immediately return to reasonable arbitration. Eventually, we would have nothing but a phrase Blowin' the wind, as if Bob Dylan sang so.

Eventually if we arbitrate, mediate, intervene between e.g. Judaism and Islamism, that role would be suited to not belonging ones to both religeons, Cristianity belonging ones neither, other polytheism belonging ones could never do so  at so ideal mission, the same thing could be applied either to Asian countries in hostility. In conclusion, any hostile emotionally relation has no method but both parties concerned together, because any kind of arbitration, mediation must be just only very temporarily instant expediency.

Probably police officers whose act was regarded as racial discriminating must be caused from that outrageous dealing ones' work environmental and social common sense generating mental frustration. And that country holding system Affirmative action's very arbitrary setting in cotradiction. In other words, organization's way to be has originally contradiction, and that example is exactly next country northern than Freedom Respecting country, as immigrants' ethnic composition and language in terms of dialect toward ex-suzarain country citizens and immigrats to that country in friendship or so.

Eventualiy anyboy of us could never be positioned at perfectly even and fair view, because each of ones must have each very distictly own condition, and that thing must be applied either to gender issue, because nobody could be positioned at perfectly even and objectively fair position, as not straight, nor not gay or les, nor non sexual, nor so. Bi-sexual is not exceptional.
(to be continued)
(Aug. 28th. 2020)