How can we regard us as? 

If we conscuously and intentionally unify our character as a person, we'd narrow our free mind too much open our possible road foward us.

Even if we need to acheive something as demanded mission, we should not dare to unify our hope nor character, because we all are so complex mind and character holders.

Certainly, we all are so complicated thinking machine so essentially and that's so intriguing problematic reality, but now that we are so, we need not to unify our nature to the only one thing, or rather we should never do so.

We all are having no choice to be selfishly whimsical being.
First we must admit it eliminating any kind of mistification to the truth.

Because we all are at real time shifting lifetime spending, then unifying one character would be so partially working so well, rather that choice must be decided by the past statistical view, then we should open the possibility to our own character, then regarding changing ourselves as one important factor, hence we should to some extent summarize our own image and picture, but to another extent, we should take a mind room to look for undiscovered character and potentiality to our own resource.

Then, either hoping to us as personal idea should be opened to unkown developing in our future, unifhing attempt should be taken anytime so surely, but either not unifying mind must be held at our mind, because as long as we are alive, we all are constantly having not drwan part at any site of our doing.

Unifying means so much in extent of arranging our act's criterion, but unless we are regarded as pathologically multiple personal one, we should never be arbitrarily unifyed as one character, because that act is apt to include prejudice, because prejudice is made of past synthecized picture. 

We should be plain at evaluating each character in opened possibility. 

(Sep. 13th. 2020)