Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Identification and Relevance Part1

Identified cognition means so much. It probably is given to us, at each moment, each different elementally identified matter, for reacting each differentiated empirically cognitive occurrence. That discernment by our mind makes each distinctive approaching aspect with each distinctive identified object.


Necessarily, our own presence as personally identified it is unexceptional. It means our own identification means publicly known to any other one for us so personally, but its aspect as other one’s mind holding aspect to us is everlastingly unidentified to us as each one has in mind so personally. Then consistently we just satisfied with the talked matter or opinion heard from the other one and we get the understanding mind at each moment, but that true aspect by any other one is ultimately unidentified and decisively unknown, absolutely packed in black box.


At this term, we all are each very isolated and never being able to see through any other one’s view and this aspect, then essentially we all are given very limited perception and mind holding impression at each moment and any of them could never be shared to any other one, and only that limitedly given aspect must be the absolute truth to us, then we all are anytime absolutely partially given aspect holders. Only one angle indicating aspect could be given to our mind, then at a stretch, all aspects could never be confirmed as panorama scoped vision.


Nevertheless, at this debate, we are awoken to its truth, and awkwardly regard its reality as human nature reality, and just accompanied with its truth, implicitly we all are sharing some seemingly so certain things with concept, meaning and material’s essence through words and language activity.


Nevertheless partially perceptive reality could be regarded as nonsense at language activity, because its thing could never mean so much in terms of our meaningful communication. Then, eventually each distinctively perceptive cognition could be regarded as inhuman reality, then we all tacitly agree only sharable truth and only to artists as painters or photographers, these perceptive value could be left as the specific interest in terms of expression.


Consequently we all are identified as only publicly meant presence, because we are personally identified as a person, only according to each utterance to show own reaction as mutual conversation and only with it, we could communicate with any other one.


Each facing relevant matter for us is anytime absolutely one definitive item neglecting all each differentiated aspect to be seen, e.g. that is mail-post, here is the station, etc.


Eventually each reaction we meet at social site is anytime meant as being public to any other one expect us as each individual mind.


These truths were already thought and inspected by very many researchers, with each aspect, philosophers and economists or so. E.g. our preceptive view must be at charged by philosophers, but each financially circumstanced thing could be charged by economists. Just each of them could be together so personal thing nobody confesses so honestly to any other one.


Then, we could say, from the beginning at the term of learning language at raised process, we all are obliged to be assimilated with society and we each spontaneously want to assimilate us with the society, then it could be not only obliged nor forcibly but neither so subjectively and spontaneously as positive desire to us as our mind from the beginning. Then even if our perception is each so isolated, but we have mind and its mind absolutely want to assimilate us with society. It must never want insolated condition, that is our own nature in mind, and brain.


And when we practice its behavior and act, we use only language, ordinally except gesture, never yet, probably gestures are as well as sign language objected to show own will to all the other one, then is must be included to language. Eventually we all are subjectively and spontaneously want to be a social member, that desire not to be outed from it and not to be isolated from anybody is so stronger than we anytime necessarily make an effort to show our contribution to society as a member of society.


Then, eventually only manner or behavior in acting could be intended to be a membership identifying, just working so silently means another language action.


Being quiet and noisy are both language activity’s example for us, because eventually our language act driving thinking mode must be the sole given our the most indispensable tools of us for completing our social obligation.


Probably, from the beginning, our mind has been meant socially functioning tool, and with it we must realize any social activity and either words as language tools must be taken advantage of our strong demand and desire to make us a member of society.


Then, even at walking on the street, we could be presence in terms of social signification, and its factual truth means we even at anonymous presence, could never lose nor forget our socially meant membership and belonging consciousness. That reality must be the nature of society.


Principle our own perception could be said as just only illusion, then eventually substantially analyzed nature could be seen so true at our social site.


All our subjective regard and individually known aspect could be apt to be neglected at e.g. numerical assessment, in terms of economics, nominal value and real value are distinguished, but political transaction keeps former so advantageously taken into strategy, then eventually we could say that any value assessment could be expediently used for our circumstance at using them, in other words, nobody could know true substance of value, perceptive reliance or anything. Nevertheless, we for the present obey the universally recognizable value proclaimed so officially.


Then, ultimately if we try to define our own course, at so carelessly focused at short term advantage, afterward we’d have hard revision to seemingly correct orbit.


Then, if we personally have or afford to having stable watching our process in running everything for own future by itself and for us, we should have very profound moratorium to watch everything so carefully, whole world trend, age demanding necessary need to us and value to invest or any act, situation’s transiting.


And unexpectedly, selecting books according to necessity for us personally is so important, and its selection should be done so arbitrarily only for us so personally.


Then, eventually any topical issue as subject picked up at news or show, the kind of presence and its popularity should be taken only into mass-media reporting business or so restrictedly, these phenomenal trend should be ignored at our true value assessment.


Then, ultimately book thing, reported thing or so are universally personally optional thing for us, definitely, not so forcibly taken subject, these things are only optionally selected items. Necessarily books we personally should read is not unexceptional. These items’ option in so personally arbitrary selection means so much for us, at these opting reality we should neglect all general view or so. These opting should be done only according to personal necessity in daily life for us. Because we have own object so personally, then with its content, we should select each valuable choice and reference at each occasion. That subjectivity on mind is very integral for us, then after all at the final stage, we must return to the personal mind.


(to be continued)


Mar. 23rd. 2021