〇As if theoligists after Protenstant Reformation thought, if the world along the universe is moving along any predestined schedule, all past was vanished we think as the idea has been stocked at some place else, any reproduction must be possible to anyone, of course, we simultanesuly can judge that that idea is completely wrong, neither, at tne matter of fact, its fact is caused from another fact that we have no idea of nothing, so absolutely zero as we can judge us only so.
But actually, its idea was possible just only in thinking.

However, being possible to judge in this idea is at least logically possible. Thus, the past must be present in our idea, consistently past is present in both present time and future either, we could say.

〇Being is miracurous between non-existence, if it would be just accidental so big event, if it was to be something which we could never say intention by God, it must be perfect once happening God’s capriciousness, we could say.

This being’s capricious character would be the obejcet we should understand so well, if we try to investigate physical and natural law, we at least could with much difficulty and by the turn of a hair could reach completed understanding as essential meaning.

Only time can be seen so never capriciously absolute in shifting.
But we could never evidence that it must be truth so perfectly neither. Because only with the fact we can confirm it in shifting at watching a watch or so as presice device or gadget, we could never evidence it yet so perfectly, it would be so true to us.

〇In the world without any changing, nothing can move and be moved, neither. Thus, it means the world filled only with time nor we could say neither, world never having time and its shifting.
But in our world, as mathematical axiom, it’s possible.
In other words, ultimate several truths must never be switched forever, it’s the cause.
But are they possible in only what we can know in a range we could know to our world?
For example, in nothing, it means complete no things only are present, any change must never be done. If some changes are met, in it, it must never be no-exisitence nor complete nothing.

But the truth that all are in shifting in consistent change, and its never changing fact that all must be changed or change by itself is never be included in it.
Namely actual world could be paraphrased as the world with impossibility never to have never changing situation nor condition, as only its truth could never be switched by anything.
Thus, the world must be said to be programmed as being so.
If the world of us must be programmed previously that only consistent chaging truth must be co-existed with its immovable, unchangeable truth with no change in changing consistently, as to be a premise of former description, only what zero(0) was swithed into only be one(1) as the First ultimate world creation must be just change, after its once chance, any change must never be copied anymore absolutely, only its thing must be the absolute truth until our universe would be disappeared.

But the world was born and in changing and in conclusion, it would be none, as vanished, nobody as witnesser of all scenes must be absent.
Thus, it must be only God. Therefore, God is paraphrased word for us who are all unknown anything of this universe as the impossibility to explain all.

〇But, if being must be born from nothing, the universe has finite as boundary and over there, was never be able to be said as over there neither, namely if it would be just zero, nothing, it means that to us, the universe is perfectly irrelevant, as being equal to the universe as being＝existence must be irrelevant, as never having any relevance to being as us.
Of course, it does never mean the absence of the relation between I or my idea of me who is living area in this earth and the reverse side of the earth with ants digging a hole, so necessarily.
It means the absolute irrelevance, absolute absence around relation.
Thus, nothing must be the condition which has no change absolutely.

〇But either nothing itself must never be changed, neither existence as being is in impossibility which has no change is impossible, at this view, namely its fact must be consistent in no change, it means that another world must be present parrarelling to our world, in other words, it adjoins with our world, that possibility to be explained may have been left to us, I feel that we can predicate only it so necessarily.

(to be continued)
(Apr. 25th. 2019)