At the matter of fact, today, I did conversation at Twitter with Spanish user at Spanish converted from English in my opinion, and through it, I concluded that English, Spanish, Portuguese, French are generally the language as with each conversation for msking clear mutual difference, meanwhile Japanese and German( probably Irish Celt or so either) are each one at which users try to find out sympathized view or so.

That daily impressive remark is so interesting and that reason is not so well at understanding nor analyze its true reason so easily.

So eventually, we could conclude with these very remarkably unidentified and annoying questionable proposition, from the beginning, if we try to find out completely shared element at relevance with any other one, that  trail must meet decisively impossibility, in other words, we could make clear both completely mutual difference nor completely indetical elements simultaneously. 

E.g. we usually unconsciously discern the songs which could give so pleasant feeling and the ones which could ease mentally or spiritually at so compsed emotion and spiritual condition.
And these two very subtle difference could never be made clear nor analyze at so clearly notionally gap or diffrence, because these tangibly and spiritually discernment obviously exist, but simultaneously that reason could never defined nor signified so strictly, because, that could not have clear border and these things at so many extents. crossed together, and just we could say so roughly that when we are a little bit groomy or depressed so lamentably healing latter typed songs are so effective at listening alone, but a little bit when we get them as mind state recovered, we are apt to listen to very preleant songs.
To some extent, we all are at society which oblige us to work at each site, and that reality must be equivalent with being on the battlefield or so, essentially.

And in the term of what we can recognize these cognition mutually unidentified discernable reality could be associated, we could say that our mind must research subconsciously mutual dfference as mental option or discernemental judgement nevertheless, these vagely cognitive difference could never be solved at precise analysis, but we certainly are apt to have streo-typed mind and even prejudice at relatively comparing or balancing plural items in really social daily life at anything to contact, face, confrount or to be besieged.

And if we honestly analyze or sort of regard them as philosophical inspectable object, we could think that each these gapped cognitive essence could be made at our two mutually certainly diffrentiated view with cognition to be myself as so plain factual truth's cognition and our own identity.

In other words, that must have very obvious time's gap. or difference at our daily life.
And these things is to some extent caused from "On Selfhood, the Question of Personal Identiy" by Paul Ricoel, at very many logical ponts and terms.( Necessarily, I clearly declared that the issue or proposition could belong to both so personally issue as each individual personal matter and domestically national and community relieant matter together at the same principle.)

To some extent, Ricoel is candidly emphacizing that each at being myself as consciousness and at cognitively definitive idea as convincing notion or kind of indicative recognition at identity are mutually essential differentiated nature and signification.
Because the cognition at being myself is just instinctively given to us and plainly undoubted truth, meanwhile identity as issue and our own consciousness could be notionally acquired pulled through delibertion means so publicly social relevent idea at our mind, then it must be indirect relatively than cognitive mind to be myself is just so undoubted and plainly necessary so very directly.

Then, necessarily, latter is gotten through our socially engaged consciousness at being set at daily social act and its cognition, then it daringly is deleted at former's just plainly tangible and directly physiological cognition, in other words, that must be made publicly postured.

These very obviously mutually gapped cognition and mind consciousness must be made time gap and its crevasse and necessarily latter must be gotten through analysis as at so instinctively public cautious moded mind could be held through introspective interpretation at mobilizing memory and learnt matters in mind for us.

At the matter of fact, these very clearly recognizable crevasses must be either relevant with logical three principles as habitual idea with regulatory categorization includes the law of Excluded Middle. 

At next occasion at debating this series' proposition, let me submit the questionable issues with being myself and cognition to it as to be identified as myself as one indipendent person meta-cognitive it toward former's directly ogirinally awoken it  and logically necessarily dragged categorizable issues in relevance and deep interactive nature so precisely.

(to be continued)

Jun. 28th.   2021

Memorandum; Upper described interpretation, ultimately and conclusively could be driven to verb's meaning and function interpreted by me at this blog as series "Verb's Function".
Gradually, these all relevance and mutually closely interacted truth could be mentioned at so precise analysis.