Japanese philosopher, Yoshimichi Nakajima claims that past does never exist as being present.
But he simultaneously emphasizes that now has some degreed range as chain spread, but his both two each distinct emphasis obviously are impossible to be composed, his emphasis is so contradictory, coz if what he tries to claim former is correct, latter it must never be possible to be set.

Essentially, past must be present only in remembering or reminiscent concept or object to the past matters’ contents, namely it must exist only in memory.
But now means at a rate anytime is now, coz of it, we can say that anytime is now and it must include any past and any future, coz our mind is consistently surrounded by the idea around the future and anytime obliged to be pulled into past passed matters for reflection and regretful reminiscence.

In other words, past must be advocated only by our mind thinking disposition, either we could say that any present matters and materials, any phenomenon must include past element and it means past legacy and remains or so kind of past itself as being left by past, and we always are interested in future prospect thus, we are constantly promoted by future coming, thus we are consistently accompanied with all past things, items, incidental things came up to our consciousness, and so we could say either that we are anytime in a time idea with being surrounded only by both past and future and the sole now but it anytime can be shifted and substituted to another.

Namely, we can define two completely differentiated two time, one is now my explaining the crossed time with making any moment now but it must be consistently surrounded by past and future simultaneously, but another time is diligently cutting any divided now as clock hands’ indicating in shifting.
And we sometimes so constantly with a blanc confirm the time clock hand indicating and both two times our mind anytime holds and clock hand’s indicating it are mutually completed individual things just we sometimes correspond them together regularly and irregularly, just so.

(to be continued)
(July. 21th. 2019)

Note; Now we can define must rely on past and future synchronically, its truth Nakajima forgets, this means so crucial to judge his theory as being so correct.