The sole truth is present, is false, but many truths are present is true.
In other words, as concerned as if we modify a few propositions or conditions we can say that the sole truth must be present.

In conclusion, everything in world is certain and if it is the truth, everything in world is in-between or so kind of in prolonged situation or standing by to the fruitage or fulfilling in its future.

On the other hand, being itself is at the matter of fact never so obvious focused only on one definitive subject, or substance, in other words, everything means so clearly neutral in no completion nor absolute incompletion.
Especially, human-beings as Da-sein are so, coz we could get any totalized universal rule or standard probably everlastingly as world aspect, coz according to the number of human being’s population, world exists.
Its matter is absolute correct truth, probably the sole absolute truth to us, ever, now present, and future everlastingly.

Its truth must be evidenced by numerous presences of the all creatures’ each distinct world, includes bees, ants, dolphins, or mosquitos, and bats, moles, owls, spiders, falcons.

Thus, world is consistently totalized with one definition and modification, coz it consistently changes itself by itself and by another power mutually, Parmenidēs(Παρμενίδης)’s theory shows that anything in world vanishes or is vanished and reborn again consistently, thus certain things are none, it evidences with his principle.

In addition to it, as far as concerned to human’s personality as mind of Da-sein could never be defined nor modified with human’s identity as essential character or true aspect, so especially because that they have words, and consciousness and calculation, in other words, human personality anytime must denies all modification and definition. Of course, originally its idea is caused with or relies on Christianity. Either necessarily or certainly its ethical premise for the present is shared to all human-being nowadays as contemporary global society. This idea was offered already by Leibniz, at a rate, Parmenidēs and Leibniz must have narrated the same proposition, and nowadays late-David Lewis has said in his masterpiece as On the Plurality of the World, subsequently.

“Here is our world, which has a certain qualitative character. (In as broad a sense of ‘qualitative’ as may be required-include irreducible causal relations, laws, chances, and whatnot if you believe in them,) There are all the various A-words with their various characters. Some of them are closer our world than others. If some(A-and-C)-world is closer to our world than any (A-and-not C)-world is, that’s what makes the counterfactual true at our world. Now whether or not this closeness ought to be called similarity, still somehow it’s a matter of the character of the worlds in question. It’s the character of world that makes some A-worlds be closer to it than others. So, after all, it’s the character of our that makes the counterfactual true – in which case why bring the other worlds into the story at all?” (1986, Blackwell Publishers)

That part’ his claim resembles the Heisenberg’s Uncertainty principle, as the epoch making of Quantum mechanics with the question to which is the particle or wave as the minimal essential substance’s character, coz Lewis’s logical method is always dependent on the focusing and discovering certain one substance’s truth, in other words, he either attempted to avoid light judgement in defining nor identifying with no murkiness. It’s courageous stance and attitude to face the reality, so essentially.
At any rate we’ve established in explicating the system of Miosis and somatic cell division or alternative splicing or so many principles of the nature, its discovery must be promoted by evading identifying one definitive thinking inclination from our mind, that philosophy must be read either in Lewis’s sentences.
Namely we should get rid of any fastidious persistent forcing so firm penetration strategic behavior or form of thinking, never definitive theory accepting honesty or so is needed, and its stance relies on the anti-Rationalism, at this viewpoint, next chance to this series, I’ll deal with Bertrand Russell’s Analysis of Mind.
(to be continued)

(July. 29th. 2019)

Note; No age was present to be so needed in withholding any certainty but contemporary age, this epoch is obliged to be concentrated to Genome project, Blackhall researching, or programming languages’ progression around the many kinds of computer system with Quantum computer and AI controlling technology’s development.