〇Physics are so interesting, coz it necessarily is science thus, it tries to output the result with observation and only measurable things are done so, only it is so obvious matter.
Thus, since Heisenberg’s quantum mechanics’s beginning, measured value is never always so precise as our incapability to measure so consciously seen to us so shared common sense and in this premise, fluctuation, entropy, linear, or non-lenear, chaos, random or so many important concepts were erupted to the concrete scientific reality of our daily life, since modern ages, by and large.

But what physicians are using the law as the notion means at the matter of fact nature being equal to universe has had been programmed previously since its birth, so as to say, kind of theological initial setting was premised in their idea as brain of physicists, we could predicate so.
In fact, physicists are often using that expression, usually recently.

〇Time must never be returning to the past.
That matter has had been so debated and claimed by many phycisists or philopophers or so, ordinarily physicists are emphacizeing that time must shift in diffusing, thus finally all things in this universe must be aspirated into the blackhole, so that we could say that some day we must have a switching moment from diffusing phase to aspiration phase, either.

What time would disappear some day means spatial enlargement as expanding universe is equal to universe’s time, of course its reverse truth is possible, namely time and space anytime together make closely collaborating work, physicists are suggesting.
Comparatively to them, analytical philosophers especially in philosophy execsively separate time and space, but anyway time must disappear simultaneously with space. Thus, it means returning to nothing.

But what makes us wander is as if I previously mentinoned this universe programmed to end finally but consistently until the final moment, as the time to be at the end of the world as universe itself, it must keep the continuation in no rest as programmed previously, if this is absolute logically right, former Part 1’s conclusion, as never changing any cease to change must never be present, it means nothing’s truth as never changing wholeness of nothing itself being equal to that what nothing itself must never change its character would be parrarelled to it, it could be meant to us that these are adjoining to each other.

However, of course what stars are seen so shined in the universe means that universe has rim as end of space, generally thought so, if it is the truth, over there, what does it mean? If it means just nothing but nothing, it means that we must never be able to go there. Just it must mean the impossibility we must never be able to go there. Coz it has no alternative around judging nothing’s absolute presence.

〇Its impossibility never to go there means absolute nothing as genuine nothing. Desoite of it, either we have an opinion so necessarily that only nothing means never changing its nothing’s character so logically, but at this rate, nothing must have had a chance as the sole, we could say so illogically. Namely universe was born in betraying its absolute truth.

However, its thing may have been irrelevant to nothing itself, you know.
If that truth would be justified, nothing itself means that it was never be able to be as if our surviving universe but simltaneusly making stars shine so as to say that coz universe was never be infinite in spatial meaning, overcoming darkenss, they could illuminate, if it would be right, it could bring us about knowing that nothing and never be nothing as being equal the existence in parrarreling together, we could be allowed to say so either.
Of course, as far as concerned to our understanding in degree of us.

〇These things are just similar to what we understand with axiom in mathematics in our brain.
But necessarily our understanding is completely different from the rocks or motels built around the suburban destricts as the character of being. Then if these are present things but simultaneously notional presence.
In summery, human using language urging us to understand is different from the observed or measured things as materials.
Of course, we can measure our own brain wave, brain nerv could be visualized so capably, but its thing must never be so different from materialistic measuring, eventually. Namely if someone was claiming that a thing is what that one memolizes, we could never judge that it was complete lying by that oneself, we cannot evidence it so perfectly, as if we can be allowed to say so, it’s the truth.
Another example can tell us that nobody must never be possible to evidence that I don’t love a woman even if I was emphasizing it is never a lie that I love that woman despite of that anybody cannot believe its my emotion.
It could never be done as if we try to measure the quantity of silicon content.
In other words, this notional understandings meant to be shared with each other of only us but never these things for example I remember something is so close to the share understanding that this universe has limit as the end of it and coz it means outside of the universe as being equal to the existence itself is nothing, the attitude or mindset as a trial to join with both completely different things, our own ( private ) remembering must be so close to what we can say as shared truth that on one polar coordinates we could say the distincitive matter with present things as existing matter and nothing as a recoginitive definition to each other, so I have an idea to all these things.

〇At theory of Kobayashi and Masukara as CP-Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction, its theory telling truth must have had the universe born, if we take it the change as a revel of being equal to existence, in nothing some kind of possibility to bear the existence as being programmed set to be inputted, its thing must be a premise, as initial setting, or to say that could be either to directed to the idea of atheism, so we can predicate so.
But or if that idea was denied, the only chance to have a big ban, that miracle incident must tell us that except it anything was consistently absolutely nothing, with no change, just coz of it to be nothing, no potentiality to change itself must be justified, but being to be existence, coz it is nothing thus it could never be changed, but being as existence never be none( nothing )then, never be able to what never to be changed anything, if its thing must be the truth, how nature must have a character being with numerical formula?!
But, we eventually finaly could never judge that the sole miracle our universe historical fact is absolutely so only once, neither.
Because previous state to our universe ( of course we could never say so, coz between our universe’s birth and previous supposed universe any time and spatial system must be absent, we must never be able to say before, after nor previously or afterward, neither in other words, nothing has only incapability to be defined as particular matter neither. ) namely we could never say, used to be, or would be so, neither, ( It means that our language syntacutical system depends only on time system with of course spatial devdelopping possibility as the premise of change) even if we can suppose that kind of another universe, it must be irrelevant to our own universe, we must say so.

〇But, at least its irrelevance must be so close to what we could never evidence that one person must understand something in his or her brain nor confirm its fact or so mutually.

In other words, we with a usual habit to debate in setting premise all things are shared to be understood mutually but it must be so different from the measuring or analysis toward natural materials with mineral, or elementary particles or so, eventually we have had used the technical term as understanding, concept or meaning differentiated to materials or so, as another kind of real things or presence, so expediently, but that understanding means just our developing way to innovate a viewpoint to indicate so kind of being as existence and non-exisitence being equal to absolute absence as nothing as if we were God or so, as the introduction to ourselves a God viewpoint and talk everything, very so closer to each other, as never being to able to evidence someone’s mind’s idea content’s presence as just right never bein in a lie, we can feel those so as to be said now I wrote, here.

Because those are never the existencial presences as if the materiaristic presence, as actual observatory reality.
It has to be meaning of material phenomenon for example igniting phenomenon of brain neuron or nerve system or so. Namely felt matter must never be felt to all the other one’s sentivity or tangibility.

And it means the same situationed definition toward never changing possibility must be absent in front of mathematical axioms once evidenced so right, publicly universally to human-beings, so essentially, could we elucidate so, could we?

If these squels we’ve covered now was appropriate, possibly our universe as being equal to existence and non-existence as nothing namely absolutely nothing and what any myself only can know absolutely ( Japanese so famous philosopher Hitoshi Nagai(1951-) has a theory that so obvious things only for each myself must never be shared to anybody to each other, but anybody has kept its taboo to mention its absolute truth, so nonchalantly the world must be in circulation by itself as we all as being in that kind of implicit managed society, and all those mentioned matter would be close to it. ) after all, obviously three differentiated worlds mutually must be present, we could suppose the theory here, so absolutely we could say, couldn’t we?

Evnetually or so in conclusion, these truths must be brought about to the possibility that rocks or trees are with genuine mind as if we believe that we must have, as the thing we call “Mind”, and material’s time and mind time separatedly thought by physicists for example Sou Matsuura whose idea originates in his defining initial setting or that however we could never be always conclude that time must never return to the past as initial set law, but he may have thought that spatially situation must never return to the past state with diffusing and expanding entropy as the theory of field, namely they physicists may have thought that changing must be along the space condition with materials, or physical law.

In conclusion, this discernment between physicists’ thinking material’s time and mental time only for us, would have another developed possibility as the evaluated proposition to be rethought, including time, space, by each self, and existence meant to being as presence or anything may have even sure mind either, but simltaneusly we could never judge that it is so outrageous imagination or phantasm as the reason to be explicated all those are given to us, we could say so either, you know.

(to be contined)

(Apr. 26th. 2019, but additonally mentioned at May.3rd. 2019）