If we try to assess something, as long as it has concrete nature, we could evaluate or honestly judge that it has meaning so much as presence, because it is emobodied with very concrete character and nature only substance must accompany and have so essentially.
Otherwise, if we try to do complate nothing, as long as it has no substance, we could evaluate or judge so reasonably that it must be perfection at assessing nothing but nothing, or otherwise, even perfect imperfection, or complete incompletion at being embodied not as much as being.
Thereby, that thing must be no presence or no substance at being not to be applied to any direction nor any usage, so arbitrarily.
Nevertheless, both perfection at being cognitive to be present and imperfection at being cognitive never to be present as being nothing must awake us that the nature in mutually symmetrical at approaching but this sliding consciousness of us must be driven to make some irreplaceable supreme and perfect matching with them.
E.g. if we try to interpret algibraic some nature both at obviously present thing and never that nature abesent thing, we must make complete formulated balanced reality discovered and recognized at our mind so confidentely.
First, if we have only substance and have no notion as nothing, we must never analyze any present matter and several things with interracted relevance or so in our world.
At this rate or dimensional term of recognition, we must need two of them as couple and matching order for outputting formularized viewpoint, in other words, we can do anything at externally working out from us with these set symmetrical recognitive approach at really facing and confronting everything, necessarily even at these COVID pandemic crisis perilpously survinving age.
When we measure any substantial item, we must use either concept with zero(0) as nothing, through that combined scheme, we could pull through everything.
Though, if we could observe any present matter as substance, we meantime at our mind, consistently have only notionally sensing another dimentional scale and ruler at our brain and mind.
In other werds, at some terms, just because we make that never substantial notion indwell at our mind, we could measure, analyze any substantially realized and materialized object, phenomenon, or so.
Consequently these formulating or anlyzing scale or ruler's presence could be sustained with our very obvious and very clearized notional picture in mind, necessarily because we inherently have these ruling tools in mind, we can positively and affirmatively react any externally developped realities.
Even if we could be taught or told by externally deployed everything at observing, witnessing all things with our own eyes, ears or so, to smell, with nose, if we inherently have no senser at our mind, we could never perceive nor grasp every phenonal things as analyzed index nor nature world's law indicating touchstone.
Thus, if we daringly summarize all these truths with diaglam and formula, next aspect accompanying appearance could be convincingly possible to us.
In Mind, inherently equipped or cognitive power as cognition to nothing= N(∀)（∃）
In Mind, reactively we view to all things deplyed at substantial world= M(ourselves ∋(∀)), and with formulating O, we must be applied at relevance like next.
(N means nothing, M means our mind, O means object to observe or withness, in measuring, or so.)
we can make formulation like next.
And necessarily, we can recognize like next.
Necessarily, we can formulate like next as infinite Antinomy characterized backward.
By the way, extension driven ∃ must never be rarely only ∃, just it must be （∃）.
Because we could never confirm ∃ by itself as substance(e/g. through measuring really,thus, it only relies on our idea in brain), though, we must give ∃ in formula just as （∃）. This thing must be analyzed and inspected so precisely either from now on so continuously.
(to be continued)
July. 26th., Aug. 4th. 2021