In these days, even if we apply objectivism, perfectly standing on ABSOLUTELY FAIR and OBJECTIVE VIEW POSSIBLE stance is in frank IMPOSSIBLE.

BECAUSE THAT VIEW IS DONE ONLY BY GOD.

NEVERTHELESS, WE ARE NEVER BE GOD.

And, GOD ONLY CAN STAND ON EVERYTHING SO IN FAIRLY WATCHING, but WE ARE NEVER SO.

BECAUSE WATCHING ALL PERFECTLY FAIR IS WHAT ONLY GOD CAN DO TO US and, necessarily we are never so, THOUGH WE SHOULD REGARAD ANY OBJECTIVE VIEW AS MERELY NOT PERFECT OBJECTIVE VIEW but MERELY TO SOME EXTENT SUBJECTIVE but OBJECTIVELY INTENDED VIEW.

In other words, even to any our smartly made or outputted complition, REGARDING IT AS NOT PERFECT is THE SOLE APPROPRIATE PREVENTIVE MIND TO EXTREME MISUNDERSTANDING.

PROBUBILITY'S MINIMAL BREAK WATER is just AWAKENED to OUR IMPERFECTION at JUDGING and REGARDING to OUR INTENDED OUTCOME as IDEALLY SEEN PERFECTLY DONE.

(IRREGULARLY CONTINUED)

Dec. 31st.     2022

Appendix; Paper, essay around analysis with statistical intelligence falls under upper all truths, though I set "writing stance" at article's title.