We usually ascribe what we confidently regard as so reliable performance to so logically ordered and arranged specifically according to duality, indeed.

However we either have another interpretation that not dependent on not dualism generally with affirmation and negation in questing no contradiction, but very another but very convincing and trustworthy method to analyze could be impossible, the kind of conclusion could be either so biased so much, couldn't it?

E. g.  if we feel beauty only to single unit, that impression or view could either be so ascertained so much, couldn't it?

For realizing it, are we allowed to utilize triangled structual metho?
Generally, algibraic order is seemed to be ordered at no contradiction reliant with positively regarding and negating as denial at no contradictory regard is to some extent biased or missjudged in false.

Triangled order could be supposed carefully, it could permit either uncertain cognition regarding it as another typed certainty. Tripartite perfection as geometrically must be composed so strictly, with so credible  salvaging mobilizable usage.

If one given supposition could be X, and to it, apparently that X's credibility must be dubious, the kind of idea could be possible, that could be Y.
Toward both two ideas or suppositions, we must submit one more another proposition. That must be that if both could be reasonable, neither both suppositions could be invalidated, e. g. God, otherwise Lord, otherwise again, Absolute nothing could be possible.
And only it must be transcendent to both affirmative view and negation as denial to affirmative view.
Because it must not be dependent on positively regarding nor negatively doing.

In other words, only it could never be evidenced correct nor incorrect.
For the present, let us suppose Z. Only it could be regarded as what it must never be regarded nor interpreted certain nor uncertain.
Neither X nor Z means either, occasionally it could be X and Y either, because ifwe don't suppose these both conditions, we must get to deadlocked condition, in other words, only that hypothesis could be the sole no contradictory absolute uncertainty's definition.

(X, Y) as duality is by itself must be no contradiction.
Nevertheless, it has one ultimate flow or defebt. That is neglection or miss catchimg. Because it doesn't take into account of extension toward perfect intention. Because perfect intention from the beginning, only what we admit that only accompanying either our mind's uncertainty. Because we can admit perfection at certainty only accompanying our mind's uncertainty. Though, if we demand truly and intirinsically no contradictory logic, we must guide us into perfection at getting just guiding account to imperfection asuncertainty in formula we'd taken since these days.

(X, Y)Z

That mustt be more credible our formulative orthodox.

(X, Y)Z → (X, Y)=¬¬⊥, because ⇒¬⊥ could be possible only at admitting ⊥.

Thus, if we take

(X, Y)Z,

(X, Y)Z=¬⊥

At least to our mind,

Only

（(X, Y)Z)=¬⊥

(to be continued)

Aug. 7th.   2021