Very bright and dark as degree's gap makes us adjective's concept, so clearly, but that duality must never be satisfied at convincing our mind.

Because we know that very bright so much and very dark so much are very partially exceptional.
But actually in brightness and darkness, not so typically physical degree's obvious bright and dark are so partially limited, though almost degree are not bright and dark.

That degree problem necessarily makes us the same example at color's category.
Then, to me, very  arbitrary in-between range is the largest extent, we could be sensed so much.

This problem was done by Nelson Goodman as so famous analytical philosopher at contemporary age 20century.

In other words, there, I can feel some typical ewample at shortage of expressional method as words vocabulary.

Namely, any langage could be regarded as so incomplete and that fact must be our mind's cognitive ability's limitation and our word expression's limitation, both fragility must be evidenced with these our mind's dissatisfaction or kind of mind's dilemma.

Meanwhile, just that limitation must evidence that our language activity and mutual communication must mean our very socially strategical survival for society, not for each menber, that so strict truth could be showon to us.

Our social necessity must be very daringly rationalized and very materialisitically systematic having no precisely delicate care, shortage of it, or so are just our communication's essence.

That'd be so necessary, because only literature could have been sustained as our amusement genre, just with that our social essential nature.

Our daily routine could never have any capacity, otherwise, social reality, by itself, must never afford to giving us that so touchy and delicate kindness.

At the matter of fact, our society thing must force us so almost, with integral procedure executing necessity.

That very obviously strict our social summarized conceptual tacit reality to us makes us only very summarized concept with only reguratory adjectives' usage at opting each vocabulary.

That fact must tell us that we still have very serious shortage at expressing and modifying any precise aspect as our possibly capable at having perception.

In other words, any modification at language communication must evidence that we all are alive in this very only expedient and only systematically equipped social machine in which only summarized and officially usefull cocept.

Thus, any creator of literature is kind of rebel or so.
At another interpretation, only businesslike and officially deligent ones who are making no mistake must be essentially necessary, in terms of social demand.

Probably our mind's dissatisfied emotional adjectives could not be so few, but so naturally materiastic and physically cocrete adjectives are so few, very limited.

We could say so eventually, nevertheless, if somebody tries to claim so, usage of any words must have absolute condition that anybody who uses the vocabulary could be feeling so familiar with that sounding and that words' own rhythm or so, though that fixation is so hard to be realized or embodied as order.

However, just at least for me, at every expression used with adjective for talking to anybody in subjective context, is felt so at shortage and not enough to be told to anybody not only myself but also to the one. In other words, unexpectedly we all are familliar with habitually incovenient things so easily and lazy at discovering or inventing more suitable expression or mentioning knowhow or so.

Necessarily, only words' nuans's shortage and inconvenience at conversation must be provided to anybody, and only so habitually not advanced nor progressed situation maages our daily life and at any work in the society, that must be our social reality, you see!

In conclusion, we could say that we have never found out truly appropriate adjective nor its usage.
(to be continued)

Aug. 4., 10th.    2021