If our consciousness to other one's mind could have been one so penetrating awareness to that we all are unknown to each other(s true mind, and only the thing could be shared to anybody, knowing that we can only imagine the other one's mind or assume it so sensetionally, with rough data with confirmation to the one's complaxion, expression, as externally shown symptom, or so.

If that hypothesis could be correct, our original language usage ancestors must have had first communication to each other one on the premise that mutually anybody was unknown to any other one's mind not as well as to our own mind. That means that we had an idea that we had assurance to accompany ignorance.

Eventually, we otherwise nobly had discovered mutually that anybody had the same condition that only each oneself's mind's content must be known, nevertheless to any other one's mind's content is consistently unknown not as well as our each own it.
Our ancestors had once knowing moment mutually that our mind's knowledge's limiation around knowing so well. That must have meant that we all intuitively and instinctively have an idea that the idea is shared to anybody ecen except own "myself".
That must have had been the greatest intellectual one step at thinking and judging, in tterms of perception, intuition, deep learning or so with many regards.

And in fact, only that thing as the greatest truth in one revolutionary one step by human society could be shared to anybody, that must have been actuation to get our own language only human now has. Being shared together the same idea as the first revolutionary one step for growth of mankind civilization.

That means that just the common discovery of that factual truth that nobody could never have a certain idea to any other one's mind's content at no mentinoning given to us as silence or very original the right to refuse to answer anything or so.
If that so great discovery was done at the synchronicity, that historical thing could have made triggered consequently to get our ancestors done necessarily common language.

E.g. at least at plants, any tree's own branch, leaf must be jointed with as natural selectively grafted necessarily the same root originally as convergently to e.g. one tree.
That thing by our language acquirement process must have been impossible, necessarily meta-cognitively getting awareness that to our own thing could be applicable to any other one, that must mean our personality and personal indentity's recognition and acknowledgement to anyone.

Definitely, to us, reality from the beginning, not as being necessity dragging as plants, each separable brain, mind at holding personally and being composed independent presumptive regarding mind, that imagination to other member must be possible to do, and that jdgement and action to be done either, our ancestors must have had civilizational societies at so ancient eras.

That's why we all from our great ancestors had been given independent body necessarily dragging independent idea at mind and brain.

Ordinary animals' any species either have independent body, but they have no notion, concept, as tool in executing ability to get language given usage for our daily life spending in society and community, to get language activity done for any social issue's solution at everything, so socially.

To us, truly meant social consciousness is what I stressed and emphacized at mutual consensus to any other one's mind not so clearly and with the idea's base, we know tthat we need languagre communication together.

(to be continued)

Oct. 7th.     2021