Generally regarded, theism could be defined as the religion in which nature thing and ethical matter must be discriminated so obviously.
That typically interpretable nature must be confirmed at both Judaism, Christianity.
Only Islamism could be discerned with former two religions. However, the exceptional presence is God, the nature is only common to former two religions.

On the other hand, atheism could be interpreted as the religion in which nature thing and ethical thing is not always absolutely divided and should not be so, that implicit premise, we could confirm.
If latter Asian regional religion could be personally familiar thing, on the contrary, theism religious form must be felt so strictly and a littel smothered tangiblity.
Because, that personal tangiblity should be swept away from reason, that course and aim at theism, specifically Christianity.

Christianity must have strict course and aim that only God’s oracle should be regarded exceptionally, and throughout Medieval eras, not strictly familiar carnalized course and aim were seen gaining ground, to these phenomena, several great religious reformists must have had active execution at reformation. That was left to Luther, Butzer, Calvin or so.

By the way, nature and ethics in mind must be discriminated, that idea is caused from that mind must be intrigued unnecessarily with only familiarity, though God’s idea must be interpreted with not familiar, only holly and absolutely correct it.
That idea must be reliant on the another idea that reasonably sustainable mind must be discriminated with any naturally dragged idea.
Though, to strict theists, Asian many religions could be seen only animism.
Meanwhile, to Asian many ones, generally Occidental zone deployed theistic religions’ idea must be seen so extraordinarily ideological.
But probably that “ideology” must have had been theism’ the most rudiment essence and mainly integral dogma.
Exactly, Asian religions could have ambiguity at discerning around nature things and human mind matter which should be strictly reasonable. Thus, specifically at Christianity, ethical judgement and assessing criterion, and rating standard are all so perfectly dividable between familiarity to nature and our humanized own ideology.
Though, at these interpretations, we could regard as theism, specifically Christianity must be ethically absolute idea providing religion.
And actually, occidental civilization’s development and technical advancement must be urged at establishment running to contemporary civilization.

Nevertheless, occasionally, we should go back home at nature and consciousness that either we all are caused from nature’s one part.
And necessarily, scientific moral and ideas are partially absolutely division between nature and our mind, but that tendency at course has been left by physics, however, Darwin’s natural selection as the mainly the most integral idea was suggestion to Christianity and its moralistic guidance’s the sole lack, that was nature and us in nature, as us as one part of nature.

Nature world has fluctuation and even weeds have naturally necessary mission.
That notice could be mobilized with Charles Darwin’s idea, natural selection, and his paper,

Exactly, Chirstianity must have questioned so significant suggestion that we should have so calmed reason that our mind mission we should attend in daily life must never be devided with any other familiarity to nature, and that idea is absolutely correct in terms of universality around human presence.
Consequnetly, juriprudence must have been established with Christianity’s that so vital signification.
At this term, human presence’s one person as our social cognitive consciousness, Christianity is the most contributing religion to human.

Nevertheless, we have daily life either with our daily familiarity and generosity, at this view, we ought to admit that either atheism religious forms must be what we should review again so carefully.

Next chance to debate, I’ll address to our mind holding subjectivity and objectivity.
Because, when we try to debate any kind of religion’s form and identity, eventually these very hard problem must stand in front of our view to forward aspect.

(to be continued)

Oct. 16th. 2021

Memorandum; Ethical issue should be regarded so specifically independent thing to any other item, that idea’s justified reason and problematically reformable idea’s possibility to reconsider are here provided so integral questions.