As long as we could talk everything, completely objectively, it must be restricted talk only 0 but not to talk 1, otherwise restricted talk 1 but not 0.

In other words, who can talk 0 → 1, or 1 → 0 is the only one who is alive and have a view as subjectively positioned as principle could be possible as talk.

Only mentioning 0 otherwise only mentioning 1 could be possible at being only objective as looking over like God.

However, from nothing to being and from being to nothing simultaneously could be told only by subjective view holder. Because being known to each death could be possible only at death's meaning. And it must be individual at being subjectively, and simultaneously, alking about from being to nothing could be possible only at being known to be present, subjectively. If the composition could not be composed, any allegory could not be impossible.

Thus, subsequently and basically, relevance with nothing and presence as being must be possible only at being and alive being. Because fundamentally, being alive must have absolute difference to nothing. And if there is no subjectivity, its understanding to being fundamentally must mean application of any being could equivalent with nothing at least regarding of each nature's difference as discerning or distinguishing as discriminating.

And basically, if we regard both nothing and being as just equivalent with each other arithmetics, but mathmatical numerical value must mean only belingings to being.
Because either mind's recognition must be possible at knowing realized reality with e.g. economic activity.

Thus, eventually, either mathematics' true understanding could be possible at discriminating between already mentioned only objective view and subjective view, and even for only knowing objective view, we must need another case, as subjective view.

(to be continued)

June. 29th., Nov. 2nd.       2021