〔②Upper truth means that locomotion must need bigger extent than the object makes locomotion.②Upper truth means that locomotion must need bigger extent than the object makes locomotion. 〕in Part 5 means that ones who can have freedom must be to them own subject, but if we regard their all conditions objectively, in context of snslysis, each subject which have freedom or not are object.

At this context interpretation, we'd presume that we could never have freedom at heading for reducing extent than our body size, and that restriction to make us conditioned is the most typically integral absolute condition at being free for locomotion, in other words, we all as spatially present things are anyway having nothing to do with our tangible time's absolute law in which ❄any present could never take back to past, ❄any past could never come again to present, ❄any past could come again to future, however, ❄only future could come to present, and ❄it either goes away from present.

To any being, locomotion freedom must be secure at extent or being extending, otherwise making extention, or extending the spatially taken distance.
It means that any reducing of internally free extention could be impossible.

That must mean that our tangible freedom relies on enlargement of extent, but internally reducing tangiblity must never be free at least at physically embodied levelled it.

Nevertheless, very stoically endurable experiencing or empirical thing could be metaphysically or philosophical freedom term, either that not realizing any diffusing stoicism could be freedom.
That kind of lavish perseverance in satisfaction could be freedom, that thing could be kind of one sadistically masochism.

Though, necesarily, never moving is one modus ponens of locomotion, but its freedom is never at spatial dimensional intepretatin, it must be limited at only metaphyisically, ethically and morally, thus these satisfied freedom means that PHYSICAL FREEDOM and METAPHYSICAL FREEDOM in GAP means some DECSIVE DIVISION of PHYSICAL LAW and MIND ISSUE.

Let us summarize.

✳PHYSICAL ORDER IS NEVER SWITCHED, however, METAPHIDICAL ORDER IS SWITCHABLE.

✳THAT PROVES that ONLY MIND ISSUE COULD RESIST MIND's FREEDOM's DEFINITION, but THAT TRUTH COULD NEVER IMPACT PHYSICAL FREEDOM's issue ANYTHING.

At next occasion o analyze these, until this time's analysis, let me eqate and neatly formulate all these truths.

(to be continued)

Nov. 4th.       2021