1 and 0 as notional concept as number's basis in regarding any world thing could have a reason to us what we could percieve any matter at notice.
In other words, this notice must make us known to something and around it, we can know its presence and at another occasion, that abence we'd know.

There, we can have an idea that something as present thing is here, there or anywhere, and the thing could make us know each of it not present, in absence in notice.

Of course, factual relevance, probably any known thing could have never awoken to our the beginning days' ancestors in species birth for homo-sapiens, just present things around world in so ambiguous cognition, afterward, noticing consciousness could have been acuired to any unit as now our individual's prototype, but simultaneously even they must have inherently cognitive mind even beforhand they exactly got concepts, in mind, inbornly, after all, that equipped nature and real world's external everything's notice urged them make any present situation and each thing moblized and simultaneously their mind's inherently eqquipped regonition capability could have correspondance with externally cognitive everything in catching notion of presence in front of our body as another presence, and latter must have meant subjective consciousness and person's cognitive basis.

More lasting span for us, ncessarily except some thing, matter with tools or any life necessity one human presence's short-lived absence, moreover, one person's death as farewel to alive member, there we necessarily have had consciousness around presence and absence in clearly known gap.

Thereby, 1 as presence and 0 as absence could have originated in cognitive basis in daily life, so both publicly level and perssonal level.

1 necessarily makes pair with 0 in our cognitive mind, but synchronically 0 could be given chance at being only after we'd get awareness around 1 so surely, necessarily contrary truth must be true.

But 2, 3, or so could inductively be gotten to us on the basis of presence's cognition and any incresed number's cognition could be induced with just being thing as presence.
But in terms of 2, fhe first another one, in one term, that consciousness's first symptom could be given to us. More than 3, any number conceptual cognition must be application of one another as basic tthing for first discernment.

Very long time's lasting and duration make us have recollective mind through memory and its each content.
And necessarily, after passed all span in life, even several decades could be regarded so short-lived or so momentary.
That detachment could drag me write this propositional analytical essay series.

Just we can imagine like next.

If we were at having absence of 0 concept, from the beginning only 1 was owned to us, and we had no idea around 0, that 1 does never mean 1 as we usually and ordinarily know.
In other words, originally our universe could never be given birth to be so, from the beginning never through 0 it could exist, probably we could have never gotten any 1's notion and concept as we know essentially attending 0 in pair and relative consciousness.

If there is only 1 world could have been present, necessarily any 0 presence must never be outputted to our world, consciousness and knowledge. That world must have only completed thing, then necessarily incomplition as our usually known conceptt could never have given a chance to be preceived.

Nevertheless, we are never present at the kind of world, because universe was born at one specific term as our scientific assuming and analytical presumption adopted even to any past thing.

Eventually to us, complition means that first we have nothing around established or accomplished condtion as our common consciousness shared to anybody, though we must be able to start something as engaging in some established object and aim.
This completion's knowledgeable notion and concept must make us incomplition, yet addressed state or preparatory step or so.
To aimed intended completion we could have now regarded as incompetion otherwise midst acting heading for the completed object, we must get incomplition, moratorium, acting in halfway or so.

In other words, if to us, nothing and being as presence could be perfectly diffrent dimensioned aspect as our world's modus ponens, otherwise, our universe could never disappear everlastingly, nevertheless for the present, we belive in a theory that universe was given birth of itself at some term and it must disappear some another day.

That kind of world could have been present, the world's mathmatics could never have the same it we actually have.
Necessarily at number itself at principle, infinity is realized as the sole presence to us, nevertheless, we can recognize the number's infinity and universe's life span.

Just toward infinite division in number order, it could have some knowledgeable consciosness around this universe's expration in time system.
In other words, number's own infinity as principle and universe's whole lifespan, to them in relevance, anyway it could be one enigmatic fact, but we can discern and recognize each notion, and regarding method as another it to each other.

For instance, one set and belonging things in cognition must mean the discernment or discrimination at both internally and externally in consiousness, though we can have an idea that each of our life must have restricted own span in which each is arbitrarily different to each other, and necesarily thorugh death, that knowledgeable our consciousness must have both presence and absence replaced with being and nothing and 1 and 0.

In spite of that 1 and 0 could be perfectly different dimensioned cognition and each subdtance's indentity is either so, nevertheless, in mind, we can easily make them pair, and that kind of one so extreme jump at being awareness must make us any cognition for pairing and praied condiyion.
Otherwise, to us, having a certain conscousness around pairing, paired things, by themselves so overwhelmingly miraculous jumping at our consciousness, and that strating to pairing condition could make us idea's order, mathemetical order's discovery and intention and extention in clearly differentiated consciousness or so.

This series' incquring content must be relevant with another series "Subtance and Notion", because from the beginning to us, substance and notion probably ought to have completely at diffrent dimension, but at our each own personal life, probably anybody could easily have that pair regarded as so natural, that jumping consciousness we could have continued to share togethe, rather very inductively afterward, we'd gotten that pairing consciousness so forcibly, first at analyzing mind, these paired couple could have mutually gapped and contradictory nature, we'd be noticed.

Yes, that notice must have been outputting any concept, with being, nothing, presence, absence, and 1, 0 and pair, paring, paired couple by themselves at each occasion and each notice, attention and interest.

According to all those our analyzed outcome, we could judge that we yet have no complition around this our world and us ㏌ absolutely solved relevance, and complition given condition to us in questioning around being and nothing, being in nothing, otherwise, nothing in being or so, either.

(for the present, this series ends, but this means another questioning necessary subject's submission to us, both spontaneously and as external factor obliged and forcibly given propositional subject.)