This series is intended to analyze the possibilty to set clearly definitive triple combination of cardinal dimensional elements as I want to define triple-ism, omitted it as trip-lism.

Then, this first chance to get its subject, let's the term of appearing aspect description.
First of all, we can have a chance to show next three terms, in terms of relevance with time and substantial regard to concrete object as we indicate at our communicative context.

                
                     PRESENCE

                     ABSENCE

                     NOTHING

PRESENCE necessarily ought to have category with next.

Toward mentioned matter, two typed interpretations could be submitted, necessarily,
in other words, at this term's significant definition, devided two typed approaches could be possible.

　　　　　　　　                        PRESENCE IN ASPECT　　

　　　　　　　　　　　  Truths                                      Fantasy
     　                             〔　　　〕　  Against left,       〔　　　〕
　　　　　　　　　　      Facts                                       Illusion

Toward it, ABSENCE could be regarded there.

                                                 ABSENCE IN ASPECT

The same aspct of PRESENCE IN ASPECT
Because, absence's interpreted regard must be reliable only on RECOLLECTION.

Toward both two time's, the last appearance could be

                                               NOTHING IN ASPECT

Actually, at conceptual ocntext, this term could appear, but this nature is completely isolated toward former two terms.
Because we could never confirm nor evidences with really embodied action. This term means never concrete, only abstract.
In other words, that term's presence, in daily life of us, just only at communicative content's context in sentences in conversation and descripted them. Because only NOTHING could be present at being contradictory. In other words, only nothing could be only meaning's indicative term, but former two words' concept is different, these are accompanying concrete images. Just PRESENCE has now time cognition, and ABSENCE has split between indicated object and now fronting situation's aspect.

With those inspection's outcome, we could interpret next truth.

EVERYTHING COULD BE INDECATED WITH THESE THREE MUTUALLY DIFFERENT MODES `PNENS, but only NOTHING could have NO CONCRETE IMAGE at our direct association, in other words, only the object whose aspect is now not confrimable in ABSENCE could be pictured at absent identity, but NOTHING could be eithern pictured the same, but that presence's none, at the case of human person, deceased, the one is dead, then that conditon of absence could not be associated in any concrete image.

In other words, at this serial comprehension, rather nothing as dead one's matter must be actually, repleced with ABSENCE, but that case is exceptional, NOTHING's indicative extent is infinitely so many in any communicative occasion.

NO DESCRIBABLE

Only the condition must be applied to only NOTHING.

At the matter of fact, honestly these categorization must have some deviod.
That must be very ambivalently ABSENCE and NOTHING could be indetically crossed.
Nevertheless, really indicated siginificant meaning in context is mutually remoted.
That not confrimable appreance only could drag us into this ambivalence.

Hence, if we try to assress to make so smartly another three dimensional conceptual element's tool, we'd have otherwise, DISAPPERANCE.

That only describes transitive process.
If we arbitrarily could suppose the triple combination's the last itrem( in the case of ABSENCE and NOTHING in ambivalence as the same signified term), only DISAPPERANCE must be adopted there.
Though, necessarily logically next line-up must be set to us.

                                                PRESENCE IN ASPECT　　
                                                 
                                                ABSENCE IN ASPECT
                                             〔identically   crossable 〕
                                                NOTHING IN ASPECT

                                                DISAPPERANCE IN ASPECT

(to be contineud)

Dec.1sr., 2nd.       2021