At former Part2, I described like next at one supositive conclusion,

BY THE WAY, “PRESUMABLY GOD MUST RESTRICT US HAVE ONLY LIMITED POSSIBILITY OF BODY AND MIND in RELEVANCE” THAT PRESUMPTION IS VERY ANOTHER DIMENSIONAL QUESTION. This proposition is ETHICALLY REGARDED ONE EASY FANTASY.

But, at the matter of fact, that easy fantasy is very attractive and enchating.
And this thing is not so harmful unless we could regard it as the same with sicientific or logical it.
But simultaneously, that very attractive fantasy's presence could never be rejected so easily. Because that thing must tell us and teach us as instruction that allegorical intenrest and literature's fairy tale tasty attraction is another dimensional value with sieitific and logical it, and rather that easily mutually discriminated and discerned reality by itself is kind of What we should review. Because our world as socially necessary each presence with science, logics and literature or fairy tale or so must be what our society necessarily gives us as some so penetrating instruction, and that thing is extraordinarily well-done mechanical reality.

IN OTHER WORDS, ALLEGORY'S PRESENCE BY ITSELF COULD BE SUBJECT WE SHOULD RUN DOWN, that must not be restricted with only ethical reason, just  I think so.

And presumably ALLEGORICAL VIEW'S OWN ANALYTICAL SCEINCE or THAT ATTENDING LOGICAL NECESSITY or OWN IDENTIFIED MECANISM must be present.
That propostion and sugession must be so useful and advantageous, at least to me, that seems to be one of so integral trth, you know.

(to be continued)

Jan. 4th.     2022