Musicians such as Glass Animals, Ed Sheeran, Justin Bieber and Bruno Mars are already thinkers. Even though 20th century music was superior in entertainment color, I think that the current musician is far superior in terms of ideology and true academicity. This is because it is an era of human survival crisis.

To live by believing in God is to do it ostensibly with anyone, and the true intention is to mutually acknowledge that it is okay to destroy everything except the one you love. If you understand it and can do it well with them, they are monotheists without being baptized. If you are uncomfortable reading such discourse, you should not read any monotheistic texts.(This is just only one possible idea, but our subconsciousness could have the mind.)

If you are obsessed with and approached by a type of person you don't like very much, the only way to get that person into smoke is to change from what you say to every time you meet and talk, giving the impression of an inconsistent person. Just give it to. This is because if you speak honestly to gain trust, the other person will grow more and more and be interested in you. It's a way to get rid of people who don't fit.

Benee and Mae Muller have a pretty good match, and their tastes clearly match to create an era. It's a completely different circle from Dua Lipa and Billie Eilish. That's why the world is surprisingly balanced. It's an honor to be present in a time of great competition. I want to bring their songs as souvenirs when I go to heaven.

For example, whether you and I are spouses or parents and children, as long as you have a relationship with the Vatican, Freemasonry, Jewish church, Hakka, Arab dynasty, and Slavic church authority, the world It can be said to be invincible. If you are in such a position, the United States, Britain, France, and Russia are in your hands, and China and Japan.

Now, the two major powers in the world are in a state of immediate action. But in the basics, probably none of these three can actually get the world. That is another world reality. However, if you are intimate with the Swiss intelligence agency and the Middle East public interest authorities, you can use these three-way twists to some extent to move the world to your heart's content. In fact, such a move is possible.

Most of the movies set in space are American movies, but I often saw them, but frankly, they are not very interesting. Why? Action movies set on the ground are more spectacular than that. Is it because the universe is still not a place that anyone can go to? Rabbits don't find movies on the space stage very interesting to me. It's just subjective.

There is certainly no danger of life if there is no turmoil in the country. However, the fact that peace is the supreme value cannot be said to be purely the idea and justice. The invasion of the Capitol by Mr. Trump in the United States was shocking, but I think that humanity may sometimes need a struggle. This is because it can be corrupted in order to avoid struggle.

Many American dramas and movies cherish the family. In the United States, people who cannot take good care of their families are treated the most coldly. It cannot be said that the same thing applies to all countries, but I do not know if Japan really cares about the family or others. However, the number of people who die without a family is not small in any country, but the number is unknown.

There are many cases in which one was very happy when one was young, but one became very pathetic in old age. Few people will be happy all their lives. So at least I want to live the happiest life in my later years. I've lived with patience for a long time, so I want to live longer than my mother at least, but I don't know now. It's not bad when you die.

The novel is really the most interesting to me. But on blogs, poetry is much easier to receive. Similarly, essays and dissertations should be the same, but this time, the dissertation cannot be read by simply summarizing it. Therefore, in the end, it is convenient for the poetry to be read only at that time. The differences between the individual formats are by no means small.

I'm trying to eliminate the frustration of real life by increasing the violence scenes in the novel, but considering the time when the novel was always published, it is necessary to have a depiction that is not interesting if you read only that part. You can't visit us on the blog. The flow of texts that are published in a sloppy manner and the articles that gain popularity on blogs are different in nature.

If there are five married couples of elites and international marriages of different ethnic groups, the five groups alone can even control some movements in the world. Therefore, when they are involved in marriage between the same ethnic groups, they move away from world domination. It is also possible to move the world with remote relevance. It's just whether you can do it without hesitation.

Poets and artists who are not blessed with money and raised and who portray their hardships as sorrow are in the world so that they will never remain in history. Because people don't like that grudge and never think it's great. Sympathy and emotion are completely different things. Therefore, no one in existence now has such a talent. Don't leave such a thing.(By the way, Andersen is not that type I now criticize.)

Both men and women are very skillful only for those who are not talented. At first, they are all deceived, but eventually they are all stripped of ghost skin. Only those with outstanding talents remain in history at the end, and those who have just passed the world are ridiculed by everyone after death. This is evidenced by history. Those who are not talented should live their own way.

I'm a man, so I don't know the true feelings of women. But if there is a girl in the world who feels alone, who really understands her feelings? The child has to rely on someone, but is it a girl of the same sex? Is it a man of the opposite sex? Does it depend on the nature of the child?
The psychology of human beings who are conscious of managing the other person is close to the psychology of having to justify self-defense because they are weak. Therefore, it is difficult for me to notice my aggression against others. If there was a woman who came to a foreign country alone and gave birth to a boy in that country alone, and the child was a girl, she would try to protect her mother.

If you sympathize with another person because of their circumstances, you can have a strong interest in them. It is an awakened objective interest. Not to myself. The only part that can be objective to oneself is when compared with others, and the limit of human beings is that one can only be seen subjectively. Many philosophers also talk. I can only rely on myself, but can I really say that I am the most reliable?

A group of people who want to lick each other's wounds may be healed inside, but from the outside, it looks extremely dangerous. Because it's a kind of cult religious group. M〇rm〇nism may be the same. Such a group can also be found in Japan. Not only licking the wounds, but also becoming aggressive to the outside. But it is also the character of the whole group.

It's easy for anyone to observe people, and it's difficult to see yourself objectively. And not everyone can easily talk about themselves. It is a very careful and self-defense against others. But the truth is that everyone should be doing their best just for themselves. The truth is, I just endure desperately in my heart. It has nothing to do with the difference between men and women and the level of social status.

A very simple but surprisingly important psychology is that humans are calm when it comes to criticizing others that they dislike or are critical of, but not against those they like. This has been the case for most of the calm and rational human beings. In other words, that is the human pit. It's surprisingly difficult to really overcome it.

There is one thing that I cannot completely deny the possibility that I will grow old and lose my reason. But one thing I can say for sure is that no matter what the immediate future, I don't have the irrational idea of becoming a politician. Only that is confident. Therefore, all reading is done objectively, but it cannot be denied that it may be dull.
It's not easy to be hired by someone and not go to a higher position for the rest of my life, and to work only as instructed by someone. A life of doing only what you like (well, I'm close to that) can never be said to be so easy. I know it myself.
I think I'm a pretty abnormal person. But I'm used to it. When the abnormal is normal, the normal gradually becomes abnormal. That's not so bad. The reason is that you can take yourself to consider the abnormal as a value and devote yourself to it. That's how I get old.

Descartes and Wittgenstein are philosophers with many overlapping parts. One is that Descartes's Kogito is a question to me, a logical propositional self that straddles analytic philosophy in general, and the limit of language in Wittgenstein's essay period is the source of the world's limits and ideas. be. The two also have in common that their military experience has become traumatic.

Jan. 8th.   2022