I feel that the amount of work is a little too much lately. Even if I do that much, I think it's because I'm not very satisfied. That said, I can't stop it. There is some kind of mental dilemma there. I'm not justice, but I'm not complacent. There is still a purpose, but there is despair that seems too far to be realized.

I started reading Levinas in the original French after reading it in Japanese. At the same time, I will read the original Derrhida book. The English introduction essay to his of Spivak is famous and I read a little. As for philosophers, America is still the best person now. Logic is Finland and Sweden. Ethics would be France or Germany. It's a Rousseau tradition.

It's easy to see that many English and American white boys' songs are very tight. White girls are wealthy and highly educated are extremely showing their attitude that they are expensive. There, the young male singers pretend to be macho. The same thing is not black. Because black women do their best to support men. But white women are different. Choose your opponent tremendously. They sing the trauma.

Since I was born, I want to bet my life and reorganize the mathematical order through logic and die. I want to change the math itself. Because the sequence order itself is inconsistent. Mathematics is actually quite untouched in many areas. I don't really understand the numbers and sequences. Is it different or similar to the molecule of matter? And so on.

For example, if you divide by 7 or 13, you will get a fairly regular number, but it doesn't matter what that means. What does irrational number mean? It's been considered a geeky question at first glance, but it's not. Mathematics and linguistics should be surprisingly close.

Linguistics has been tried to be systematized by Saussure, Bambunist, Jespersen, etc., but in modern times, it has already been tied up with mathematics and research is progressing. In the history of mathematicians being logicians, the great geniuses of logic had all linguistic perceptions. Hilbert, Brauer and Dedekind are all mathematical linguists.

Since the 20th century, mathematics has spent nearly half a century on the debate between formalism and intuitionism. The former was Hilbert and the latter was Brauer on the right. But mathematics has been dominated by many genres applied to computer science. So are other logics and sequence rules in binary. But there are domains that have been neglected.

In fact, all computers are based on the binary system, but there can still be quite a lot of systems, and the order of gene composition in biological theory should be applied to mathematics. I'm sure someone has already started it. In the future, logic and mathematics will surely be tied up with the specialized theory of natural science. Biology has always been the case.

It is easy to think that adjectives are derived from the dichotomy that, for a certain situation, the area is large and the area is small, and in fact it is a decisive property. But this dichotomy also means ignoring a fairly wide range of things that are lost by being dichotomized. The rabbit hut is small, the Tokyo Dome is wide, etc. But I don't touch the difference between the Kanto Plain and Russia.

One of the decisive properties of adjectives is, in the context of the speakers, what the subject is, and by all means, it functions to mean affirmation or denial for that subject. But apart from that proposition, the vast territory that cannot be overstated by the wide and narrow dichotomy is unquestioned. That is the decisive function of adjectives. But that's a postponement.

In the case of verbs, for example, when showing the act of searching, we try to convey it by adding "searching in detail, searching from corner to corner" based on adverbs and modifiers. But the verb itself works in the language so that it doesn't expand. This is one contract. It can be said to be a fixed point setting. First of all, such a premise exists in the whole sentence.

Modify and limit is modify in English. This verb alone can show everything in English. An adjective is to gradually limit the situation to be described. For example, the little goat was white or black. Are you older or younger? Adjectives are tools for narrowing down what the speaker conveys. This is the first fixed point setting.

To tell one proposition is to postpone many other propositions by telling it. Then, limiting the proposition to something can be said to be a mutual confirmation that it is impossible to express or discuss all things at once by doing so. Speech act is the intention of confirming that we cannot say everything at once, based on the setting of propositions.

includes not only the size of four and a half mats and the size of Tokyo Dome, but also the difference in size between the Kanto Plain and the whole of Russia. However, for some reason, both the former and the latter are the same size. Even the meaning of the mutual relationship is completely different depending on the area. Why is that? The vocabulary that shows the difference between Kanto Plain and Russia and the vocabulary that shows the difference between one room and Tokyo Dome should be different.

The native people's language should be more discriminating. This means that if languages such as English and Russian use more reasonably simplified vocabulary identification to save time in communication, the subtleties of the language will be lost as the form of state is formalized. You can think of it. The ultimate purpose of the development of civilization is to give up the fineness of identification and save time.

The utmost intent of limiting verbs, simplifying adjective comparison criteria and saving rational vocabulary is to enable agile movements of social members to reach territorial expansion, facilitating aggression through time savings. Not for the sake of it. The abundance of native tribal languages is full of love, and the simplification of national languages is a convenience to justify invasion of other nations. English is the ultimate.

In the future world, the excess of capitalism must be corrected. We also need something that is an overkill auditing body with the United States as the advanced. Too much freedom in investment creates a wealth of injustice, creating a situation where a young Afghan girl decides where to go for her bride and her parents receive money to prevent hunger. Only China is not evil. (In the US, so harshly poor ones are not so few.)

It is also good to write a dissertation that discusses the difference and homogeneity of the way of faith between Levinas and Gabriel Marcel. Levinas’s “In a different way from existence or beyond existence” and Marcel’s “Existence and possession” are analyzed in detail, and if their overlap and inconsistency are clarified, it would not be quite interesting and meaningful. Is it?

Isn’t the word that a man is terribly hurt by a woman who falls in love with him, “You’re misunderstanding something?” Does a man have more cruel words than this one?

Jan. 11th.      2022