At any company, production department, sales one, marketing one, advertisement one, and account one, any charge must be expected so stable advantage by CEO.
Thus, essentially really outputted profit is what we ought to satisfy us at the level of accomplishment with final profit and both expected one, with more ideally anticipated one in no harsh gap must be necessary.

On the contrary, each of them had variation, that company's stability must have shortage, in other words, expected profit, anticipated one as the ideally regarded it as aimed (targetted) it are all approached mutually is the long period stabilized reality and that must be near the closest to the ideal.

nevertheless, really very inbalanced variation anytime dominates our reality.
Then all these things can be interpreted into another definition.
Future prospect's uncertainty makes harsh gap among these three criteria. Because if we personally take gigantic advantage our business, that reason must depend on our three index's gap was just given at the best uncertainty, in other words, that means either that any other company must have failed to set three criteria and probably that preliminary them must depend on optimistically ideally set them as true reason to lose gamble.

That is equal to what any other competitor was losing with happy-go-lucky easily addressed gamble, in other words, expected profit was probably overcome by anticipated one as the manager's decision was negatively optimistic, then pesimistically careful decision was necessarily demanded, but he did not do it to his company.

These all process is equivalent with nature world's complicated system of any species' co-existence.
Hence, essentially, coolly expected expected profit index and optimistically anticipated index as gambling opportunity's field given by accidental opportunity.
And necessarily. toward really gained profit and preliminary two ones could not be so harshly gapped, that state must be long period stable strategy and that means either neglection to complicated system as kind of abundance of species with each different strategical creature.

And necessarily, next definition could be composed, that is, TO US, CROSS SECTION'S COMPLETE FLAT RELEVANCE'S REALIZED STATE as HORIZONTAL COMPLITION is ALL COMPETITOR's IDEAL ACCOMPLISHED APPEARANCE.

Nevertheless, actually, very careless gamblers as lazy managers are present, another very vigilant one must take advatage of their lazy decision as losing gambling, only the one must the best fotune profit as expected profit and anticipated one were overcome by really gained profit as his or her carefulness could have do the one winning.

Hence next principle must be possible.

TO US, IDEALLY REGARDED INDEX means NEGLECTION to REALLY REALIZED COMPLEXITY, then its nature is COMPLITION of SHARPENING the HORIZONTALITY.

This is just cross section providing reality, because capitalism must depend on both winners and losers must be premised, though mutually with all competitors even getting depends on only communism as planned economy.
And its demand must be dependent on compexity in harsh gap of each species' co-existence in perfect delition.
Then, substantially US's super manageres are gaining gigantic profit which was gone through with investment.
Investment's freedom must depend on acceptance of complexity as co-existence of careful ones and careless ones.

Gambling winning must have absolute condition.
That is three indexes with anticipated profit as aim, expected one as objectively calmed judgement and really gained profit in no harsh gap as variation, and not only it but also the ones must have vigilant observation to any other competitor's carelessness, and to it, they gambled to gain moreover they expected negatively. And relatively they easily got their winning.

Eventually, capitalism's winning in race is reliant on CROSS SECTION'S HORIZONTALLY IDEAL STATE'S GAINING, but it only depends on TO THEMSELVES, ANTICIPATED PROFIT must be set LOWER, NEVERTHELESS, EXPECTED ONE must be a LITTLE BIT HIGHER. That last prospect must rely on any other one's lazy management.
But THAT EXPECTATION MUST BE SUSPENDED at the LAST DECISION.
Probably the ones must have kept their negatively regarded prospect to their management to the last running term, until the term they must have only controlled abstinant management from gambling, and just at the only once coming timing, they must for the first time gambled.
Becaus they could have conviction to that any other competitor was failing to be vigilant at getting the best timing with enlargement, investment, or so.

Though, necessarily wealth's unequarity's control depends only on all competitors' three indexes euvalent with each other as IDEALLY HORIZONTAL CROSS SECTION, and daringly iteration is here provided, these strategy must contribute wealth's extreme unequality, but essentially CAPITALISM must depend on FREEDOM of INVESTMENT, and that means VIGILANT WATCHING to ALL LAZY MANAGEMENT made by any other competitor and just at the last spurt, the ones could have gambled to any other lazy competitor.

These mentioned things were all against Part1's claim paradoxically.
Nevertheless, from these times on, we must grapple with saving abstinance to cause nature destruction and to it, we should aim the ideal target for profiting. In other words, neatening nature resourced must be the emergent aim not happy-go-lucky strategy.
In co-existence of nature resources, we should persue our profiting.

Let's summarize this time's propositional essence.

TO US, AIMED PROFIT must be EQUIVALENT with NEGLACTION to all COMPLEXITY with each gapped state making variation.
TO US, PERSONALLY, THREE INDEXES as with actually gained it, expectedly objective it, and anticipated it as aimed target NOT HARSHLY VARIED. But meanwhile, TO ANY LAZY COMPETITOR, in watching their each doing lazy management, we could be allowed to take advantage of it for gainig much more, in other words, its act means ANY OTHER COMPETITOR'S LAZY OPTIMISM around profiting in EXPLOITING THESE FAILED ABSTINANCE around three indexes.

This time, I provided mainly winning method reseach and its methodization, at next chance as Part3, we will address to analyze welfare around winners' obligation and necessary task.
(to be continued)

Appendix; to us, cross secttion of living area means both this time's three indexes of expected objective profit, anticipated aimes one, and really gained it in no harshly gapped.
On the other hand, at capitalism, winners' take all strategy must destruct nature resources, then necessarily winners of profitting competition are obliged to be responsbile for realizing welfare task and its obligatory embodiment. By the way, all three are numerical value.

Jan. 4th.      2022