Sparrow's death moment was impressively memorized in my mind.

Small animal species' death must impresss at least my mind.

Very frailly powered one's death, disappearance from this world makes us some strong impression.

That impacting mentality is surely different sensible matter, to our mind, that nuance is left so exactly.

Very hugely larger extent material's disappearance is just giving us a civilizational ruin's atomosphere, but very tiny smaller thing's it could give us so unidentified empty feeling looking at it.

No reason I can have in mind, but to small flower, to small pet animals, or to small nature resource's part accidentally made in past unexpectedly makes us impress own mind, so automatically.

All these are not intentionally, just very automatic mind catching compass can move unnoticeably. Particualrly, at our daily habitual road we everyday use going through from own our residence to our own work or some obvious destination or so, habitually familiarly confirmable object could be deleted suddenly, our viewing mind immediately could know its change, that thing proves that we are familiar with unexpectedly so trivially small element in daily moving.

If we try to analyze that small unconsciously noticed thing's reason, unexpectedly we could know explain or interpret so penetratingly and that thing otherwise shows our another mind nature to keep an eye on so small or not essential item in keeping our own job or habitually concerned thing with road, our own room, familiar landscape or so.

We are all nerve physiological presence to find out so small dotted kind of featured somewhat at any field, any familiarly watchable site or so.

That small impact must be made by our daily objectively done act, with job, commuting route, or any daily item.

Otherwise, to so bigger or larger extent thing's future going could be expectable to some exetent so easily, though even if the thing's disappearance is, except out of the blue having knowing to its excluded aspect, easily assumable. Nevertheless so tiny but unconscoiously habitually confirmable thing's excluded change could unexpectedly be seen so quickly in impressive mind, and our memory domain could drag our mind to be conscious unexpectedly persistently.

That reality's character means that we usually to very important things have only definite and signified cognition, meanwhile, to not so important things, we only have impression and just frail interpretation automously made in mind, but that frail nature rather makes us know that our perceptive life could be featured with so tiny small things' presence in totally gathered state and consequently synthecized entire picture in our perception.

If these hypothesises are correct, we are the presence which could be carried out to totalized and synthecized appearance's perception in very precisely small item's each subtle change, losing, otherwise, added, inserted swtiched state, in other words, very basically positioned greatly mainly signified elements are contrarily susained with each tiny not important, not essential elements in gathering and concentrating by external power or so.

If these interpretable thought could be appropriate, to us to any small thing, item or so, having some fraily identified cognitive approval to these presence as not mainly subjective items essentially drive us have the most important items we have to notice in mind.

E.g. in sentences, so small devise of words' arrangement, our own room cleaning, neatening to all files, papers, documents, or so etc., if those all things could be concerned and related to our requisite elements, we could not be allowed to neglect tiny parts, things, and small change in our life.

Very simply, major things could be sustained with minor things' subjectively composing background condition, and if we try to pay attention to any field as outside of our home or work, we could be noticed to any small discovery and reviewing occasion to minor elemental presence.

Jan.  15th.       2022