Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Love and Justice ❶

Love has very awesome danger that anybody absorbs in it could be netted at mess-up for selfish idea around beloved ones in taking any other one neglected, consequently any lovable emotion frequently takes anyone who is in it to do love only the one's beloved one or ones and exclude any other one, so in egoistical view and act.


That must be to some extent so egoistical prejudiced but simultaneously very typically even narural disposition.


By the way, familiarity must be reliant on preceding attitude and autonomous behavior and option only to very favorite one, then necessarily it depends on very individually biassed selfish stance, and almost conservatism must depend on its intended executing life stance.
Love is blind, that very commonplace instructive messsage has no lie.


Meanwhile, we need fairness, evenness, and all these sustaining justice.
And that could be necessarily very objectively not dependent only on familiarity and to anyone but the one who has own mind's identity in keeping same deal and manner, though its stance does never afford to take own affection to any other one, though that mind's stance must be applied by almost concsiencious politicians ( ideally, that is correct, nevertheless, not that action could generate, so genrally.)


The most trustworthy and worthwhile conviction in the fairest justice must rely on only no discrimination taken to anyone but each oneself, anybody could be awoken to the truth's correctness objectively, but anybody must have own subject and that must mean own reason to get any justice, anybody should preserve any other one's selfish favotism thereby, necessarily our true affection we should preserve, to anyone, is the attiutude which is being gerenous in mind to us.


In other words, to some extent to any other one, trying to overlook small selfish dispostion unless someone's act could offend our public safety.


Eventually, we can have some one credible conclusion for the present that we should take appropriate remote distance for respecting each privacy. 
That is the biggest moralistic normativity and either the minimal ethical one.


Though, at the matter of fact, even between wife and husband, how each one could take respectful manner to the partner is unexpectedly so grave and important factor at keeping long relation in life span.


However, more being relaxed, and easy talk could be better.
And justice is eventually not so familiar, or so mutually favorite emotion to the other one, but at work, or in any unit, group, municipality's fellowship, or any relation, we should not be too much friendly than necessity, never yet, fundamentally that excessively taken mutual friendly relation is not so appropriate, and rapidly gotten that relation frequently could be broken in so earilier term after starting of the relation.


Rather so mutually independently kind of half indiffrently contacting to each other but simultaneously having mutually only socially courtecy and politeness in greeting and at emergency, stiffly cooperating together is very rudimentary must we should keep so carefully.


Yes, eventually we all should be keep appropriate distance and mutually properly remote relevance, that must be minimally necessary and mutually needed and demanded way for having healthy relationship.


At next occasion to have experiment on thinking, family relation specifically parents and children, that could be the main theme.
(to be continued)




Jan. 16th.     2022



Appendix; This series is not so regularly continued, rather so whimsically I'd keep this theme, and I want it lazily written from this time on.