One scientist's theory, logician's it, otherwise, one novelist's literature creative stance all are signified or mean just arbitrary neglection for making opted some items or the most important it stand out for convincing own hypothesis, though to our all professional mission, any individual jump or radical step means leaping base's building up action according to own subjective arbitrary judgement, then essentially all leaping intention depends on just neglecting regarded unnecessary thing so subjectively.

Thus, necessarily according to each one's personality and own usually taken attitude, and professonal stance, that opted object and neglected one are mutually very remotely different.

That thing could be replaced that our own idea's blooming or kind of development must mean nothing but one choice in decisive option in denying any other thing originally we could not regard as so unnecessary, nevertheless, for advancement of theory for scholars and leitmotif for author of literature means just arbitrary declaretion of war to antagonists.

Thereby, one academic movement's histrical step and swtichable footprint means kind of battle, then necessarily, one so dominant theory's appearance in outstanding powerful social phenomena means another one's bold rejection and purge or kind of expeling and eliminating in radical strategy, at this extent, in this world, any academic movement and authorized remarks or so are never always so fair nor so appropriately taken procedure adopting case, never yet, rather so outspokenly, all figthing must be fierce political hegemonical fight's result, at this regard, truly fair and gentlmanship applicalbe case is almost none, that ideally regarded view must be one of illusion we are prone to interpret.

With these point of views could be taken account of our analysis, any dominant theory means just arbitrarily politically opted majority's one expediently fixed criterion, though, necessarily it either could be overturn at some another day in future, nevertheless, that swtiching must depend on very time and its conveying trend's uncertainty, thus, essentially that future ongoing expectation could be so difficult, though essentially any professional circle must be obliged to be impacted, and either affected by negatively regarded factors, though any formal circle member could not expect so precisely, that could be easily understood by anybody, in refference around this several years' presumably continuous COVID veriant evolution's reality must tell our mind in impressed state that we are perfectly unknown to any future expectable development and movement's macro levelled appearance.
In other words, any outcome must be told only at second guessing.

Nevertheless, gentleman agreement or kind of gentlemanship dragging carnally regarded justice could suppress any member expose true appearance at having ignorance around any prospect, that must be ordinary any circle's circumstance.

There, let define it expediently "X's hidden truth", and anybody must pretend that its X must be the trustworthy ultimate truth for interpreting any theory's correctness.
However, actually any circle's substance must go on around that "X's hidden truth" at least until truly penetrating solvable theory's appearance.

(to be continued)

Jan. 23rd.    2022