Very important fact we must notice is obviously that we all are independent, though, we are essentially isolated then rather for diffusing that absolute fact, we could gather and have group action.
In cultural anthropology, Proxemics as one researching genre exists. That research aims to inquire human socially inclined each individual’s distance we should take for socially practical inquiry.
However, that study means more group action, and group order’s various patterns recognition must drag that study content and signification.
However, my aim and intention differs from it. My interest mainly consists in more personally individual acting pattern and locomotive condition or daily practical physiological recognition.

Group and individual in relevance in inquiry means sociologically, anthlopologically reasonable and indentified attitude, but my stance is not them, more approaching to mono unit as our own body’s physically compelled condition and its inducing physical and mental spiritual effect.

Certainly music thing has two very differentiated listening method, one is personally listening in own rom, as indoor experience. Another is going to concert hall, club or so, with any other audience. Necessarily my theme is dependent on indoor listners’ mentality and its own tangible emprical approach.

Frankly speaking, for group action and activity space’s meaning must change from personal use for working with paper drawing up, or so, even if one desk given official working must have own outstanding difference from personally studyng in front of own desk.
Group order’s essence must have been stdied by anthlopology and sociology.

But logics is on another approach, that must have mission to analyzed personally thinking cuircuit and its advancing meaning. More generally philosophy must have own approach in which any philosopher must study our essential spatially extent signified identity and us which could be set proposition around recognizing space.

The most different point both things have must be logical and philosophical approach is reliable on mainly personal brain thinking and taking action, on the other hand, cultural anthlopology and sociology must take approach language commnicative commnity’s nature featured one person’s thinking and mutually reguratory and habitually acting pattern.

Necessarly, these two things could have so close and sifinified bond, but now my approaching object consists in personal mind’s heading direction around spatially indentified several mutually differentiated conditioned deliberating approach.
Though, phenomenally, probably personally walking in huge open space and doing with intimate fwellow or so in that space could have essential difference to each mind at doing so.
And this difference essentially means so much, but for the present, we’d like to proceed only at logical approach.

Next chance to analyze, let’s have a subject how we coordinate our own condition in each spatially significant method.

(to be continued)

Feb. 3rd. 2022

Appendix; When we walk around huge empty field with familiar and mutually friendly fellow, spatially pressuring some anxiety or horror must be mitigated at relaxed feeling. Next one’s presence relieves our own mentality like destined community in fellowship(that must be our instinctively equipped survival protective instinct for unexpected attacker to our own body).
Probably mutual language communication mitigates our anxiety midst huge space diffusing insolated mind.

✷