Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Cross Section of Living Area Part7 Noun in Past and Mind in Now

To us, notion as set with past, present, future means itself of one set already means cross section.
In other words, what we can know the set as each completely separated condition by itself means our own cross section for comprehending notional concept and understanding meaning.


Past is the thing in which we can clearly know everything including present.
When we think it as present, already it must be past's cognition, that was Bergson's intepretation through "Material and Memory". Probably Freud's claiming "free association" could be adapted to the truth.


Though, that clearly divisional awareness must be our language activity's one mutual implicitness, though necessarily, that is kind of basic legally and regulatory binding to our reality. In other words, already notionally and conceptually comprehending habitual acting and conventionally seemingly correct in our idea's articulation is just our subjective shackle, and that must be our proof of socially identified creature in whole species, as the particularly given faculty.


And, specifically noun must be the most fundamental fixed value as what we'd noticed and understood in premise, then noun must be our basic view to past as Bergson claimed.


That past's absolutely fixed vaue for us is God. That instructive interpretation was done so clearly by Martin Luther.


Noun's recognizable own mnd's grasp means past's stoning on mind's ground.


In other word, mind just itself must be rare not interpreted present in time cognition.
But now's cognition itself already had been fixed though, it must be intepretation to immediately passed already none ex-present to rare "now".


Luther's no pretending to be myself only in front of God means one of the most genuine now's own past nature, in other words, identifying, signifying by themeselves must be fixation to rarely held now's consciousness.
Though, alreadly when we have some own clear consciousness, that thing by itself must be (having) cognition to own now equal "myself" through basic objective view.


Though necessarily words and their meanings in comprehension is one of our the most original mind's cross section guided into our mind for impressing by our consciousness.


Freud's free association method was probably meaning that mind's own procedure's subjective following from origin to outputted result.


In other words, any inrepreting mind includes already time's mutual subtle rag as gap between past and present(as now) and from now on(as future).


However, at the matter of fact, we have no exact method nor evidential data around that mind's own procedure, thus, just because of these truths, we could have previously words by themselves, for expediency.


Noun is the most premitively evidential one fixation around each now's factual indentifying. And necessarily, next degree of concretion around fixation to past immovable truth.



PAST (NOUN > ADJECTIVE > ADVERB > VERB) > 
                                              NOW indication(NOUN > ADJECTIVE > ADVERB > VERB)




And God must be the absolute PAST and NOW's Accord. That is interpreted in Luther's text with De Capitivitate Babyronica Eccelesiae Praedium(1520), in WA, Abt. 1, Bd. 6, S. 495-526.
(referred from 宗教改革三大文書 付「九五箇条の提題」マルティン・ルターMartin Luther 深井智朗訳 講談社学術文庫2456)


(to be continued)





Feb. 10th.    2022