If we interpret space what could not be divided by anything, space could not have extension, at least in terms of what materials must have.

As long as it is material, that must have extension.
And in the case, extension must mean having volume and its reality must be made of divisible material.

If only space must never be divided, only space must have no substance in which any division could be possible.

By the way, division means extensional plus enlargement could be possible, in that dimension, for the first time, division must be possible.
Because plus extension must be equalized with minus extension’s infinite reversed directional extension.

Nevertheless, only space could never be divided by anything. Because only space could be interpreted as no material nor no substance, nevertheless it must never be equalized with zero(as nothing), if it was complete nothing, from the beginning, any material could never exist with the chance to make it be.

Space itself could be measured by ruler or so as extensional being, only with the condition which any divisible presnce could not be equipped, but simultaneously it must attend some material.
If upper truth was correct, necessarily space and marerial must be present only with one set in universe as the absolute condition.

Nevertheless, the condition in which only nothing of material exists could never be measured, because measuring tool could never be there.
The thing necessarily space is not divisible and divisible presence is the term only for material.

Nevertheless, if extension means only what could be divided, either space must be divisible, but only space could never be done, and if it’d be absolutely correct, only space must never be material, and it has to have no extension, therefore, it is equalized with nothing, but it’d be contradictory too.

If extension as concept must depend on the state in which divisible things are infinitely put together, and if space is not that thing, space must become fundamentally what is equalized with nothing. Nevertheless, it’d have contradiction, obviously space must have extentional some identity.
Though extension must depend on another definition at least for only space. Because only space must be based on only transcendent law. Because only space must never be normal material.

However, if either space could be one of material, at a stretch, any contradiction around those extension and division in one set as conceptually, materially no contradiction could be solved.

However, if space itself could not have materialized extensional nature, how this universe could expand and afterward disappear?

(to be continued)

Appendix; In other words, materials and space in some organic joint yet identified so clearly, that possibility suggests us some other law’s presence.

Feb. 21st. 2022