If someone tries to overtake another one, persistently more and more, that another one could never be done so by someone in question, rather another one who is caught up with must be persistent at not overtaken by the one.

That's individula emotional dimensional issue. Because mind issue in company, any our belonging group, organization, circle simply any unit.

On the other hand, each one's mind's individual issue is not universally effective. Because only another publicly regarded mind's issue must be present in awareness to us in our own daily life. That truth could not discriminate anyone.

One is ordinarily blonging consciousness. Another is governing consciousness. In other words, governing intention means unexpectedly our mind's resentmentally motivated kind of retaliating mind in one unit.
That truth means that any group consciousness has own personal emotion to any other member except each one's mind.

Essentially, in the same belonging consciousness, following ones and governing ones are necessarily separated as group mentality's aspect.
Eacg consciousness is even at the same position and same class, among any unit's all gathering, necessarily each one's community's own role could be fixed in some enough period since first meeting unile each now.

According to each member's character, capability or any kind of factor mutually for knowing to each other's role and own charge with specific capability.
Each member's reason to belong to the unit is essentially differentiated.

Anybody necessarily thinks that one perfection as the most ideal method should be taken, if it'd be present, anybody could have consensus in no articulated order, so implicitly, and anybody could get satisfied agreement, the unit could have smooth working time running.
Nevertheless, actually our known almost unit must have mutual not so well understanding nor not familiarly known to each own capability, though, consequently in any unit, usually almost ordinary members must get own conclusion in mind that probably if there would be ideal state for unit, that'd be mutually kept consensus and agreement with spperior officer's assignment and allotment to each member with mutually classified job content, mission nature or so, nevertheless, so easily all members' satisfied condition is not acquired in so short period after inauguration of the unit in question.

In other words, at any unit, we think that even at so short period in temporarily demanded mission, that ideally mutually satisfied condition could be generally impossible, far from it, mutual contry's relevance with birateral relationship or trirateral and more that plural relationship, any ideally agreed condition could raised its own difficulty.

In long eras history, each country's own dissatisfaction could have been accmulated mutually, though this time's one so ever traditional uniting country's own solusive invasion must be executed in their own emergent necessity for the country.
Consequently ever pals with two ethnic people's solidarity was at some period, broken up into mutually misunderstanding mentality together, each of them must have own gapped stance around governing and territory's orthodoxy, because each ancestoral niche around habituation and each citizen's ethnicity and pedigree appearance and its history are all entangled in complexity even in one habitual zone, and area. 
Thus, eventually perfecly mutually satidfied consensus or agreement must be seen so impossible, only that emotion mutually is shared to any individual habitant, though this time's so tragic development in military invasion's embodiment could have been made.

And necessarily these so complicated circumstance could not be easily mediated by any country, or organization or so.

Hence, any military invasion's execution must have own intuitively dissatisfied mutually gapped emotion in each action made by each one.
And that mutually held gapped emotion could be derived from one side more strongly done push, and another side could have feeling to be pulled by pusher, that obviously active and inactive gap could be mutually held in any situation, though more and more mutual incompatible mentality and emotion could be made into fixation mutually.

Though negotiation table is occasionally set, but only paralelled condtion could be made unnecessarily. In other words, at any negotiation, each side could have no feeling not pushing and not pulled nor not pushed and not pulling in the best balance mutually sharing condition, though negotiation table was not ending with any conclusion and warefare was moreover enlarged into now mess-up condition.

Certainly at each occasion, each side desperately has looked for the best mutual consensus, but it hardly be done mutually. Eventually, mutually the best satisfaction and mutually the most effective method could be sought after to each other, nevertheless, so far that could never have been done, then fighting must have accelrated screwed-up state to now situation.
From outside, perhaps various kinds of transaction and wisdom could have been privided so desperately so far, any ideally solution must never be found to each other.

Probably ideally universal solution must never have been readied for each other, only not the worst it should be evaded to each other, only that mind could have been shared together.
(to be continued)

Appendix; Anybody in world could infer any ideally the best solution could never have done everlastingly, only that inference could be held at each side's mind. Though from the beginning, only giving up any perfect appearance in solution must have be dominant, though only least endurable gulping could be sought after by each other.

Mar. 7th.     2022