Generally, any other mamal except human have no extenstion, conceptually, or recognitively at notionally, logically regarded extent.
We can have come and go at one actually realizable scheme, in experimental cognition.
It means discrimination between possibility and impossiblity.

That extent must be switched at very limited condtion. E.g. measure, precise configulration of our human's general capability at realizable levell and standard, it could be scientific measurement and control in progress.
Nevertheless, it'd have certain limit. Because ctirical value and point of view or so must be arbitrary index at each momentary our accomplished technology for the present.

According to our technological value in advancement's possible extent could be extended.
That enlargement must be our regressional standard. One limitation around measurement makes us next accomplishment aim.
Necessarily, error or mistake makes us have rescheming and rebuilding a grand plan for next step.

However, probably our cognitively asseable view must never limit only objectivity.
There must have been either our human's own ethical value.
Nature resources' destruction worrying held by our mind is not only our objectively measurable assumption, but our own very instinctive intuition, around even to plants, we can have sympathy, as the same creature, to some nature's miraculous exetent, we can have certainb sympathizing emotion, at not only savagely equipped sensation.

Though, to us, ethics must never be derived from not only notionally educated knowledgeable sense but also very physiologically and very biologically em never be derived from not only notionally educated knowledgeable sense must exist.  
That is not only epistemologically motivated mind but also so physically motivated, not at words comprehension, but tangibly original not words reliant, just close to coma state it.

By the way, premates generally ought to understand own death, at another day, so exactly, but probably they except human as us could not have perfectly relative view around before own birth, and after own death.
Of course, to some extent, they could understand them either only mainly intuitively equipped sensing.

But we are partianlly the same of them, but clearly at another side, very celarly different, we can have certain mind to deliberate own death and what could generate after own death, in terms of our own personal presence in perfect absence.
That must be to us ultimately comprehended lifetime and its disappearance in nothing at mutual contrast in critical crevasse laid in our awareness around being's cognition.

In other words, very materially horizontal time's running daring cognitively arbitrary transformed cognition. Only meterially our known time strides our lifetime and after our own death. This could be paraphrased into what only meterially regarded time running and our own consciousness aknowledging own noticeable time running in symmetrically grasped partially crossed and to another extent mutually perfectly segregated in clear breaking off conditioned awareness means some perfect irrelevance.
Though there must be somewhat so decisively actuated absolute duality's kind of origin.

Therefore, more and more regression means so much, at least to us, language accompanying own nature creature.
That very primitively born kind of absolute ethics' origin as not divided with ethological originated idea.

In infantile days for us, knowing own mortality as one of our species' fate shared with any other species must make us so easily the absolute notion of immortality.
In earlier life days, we'd been known to absolute divisional so serious ditch or kind of very nihilistic hollow. Its utmost mutually segregated destined facts' in custommeized understanding makes us own human individual character in lifetime as consistency of personality.
In other words, some acceptance stance around mortality makes us own charactristic nature to mind and identity in terms of society presence abiding it and privately held mindset.
With these mindset stances, we'd have life course, and own life spending stance.

And our known internally tangibly awareness attending thing in daily life makes us some constancy accompanying concisousness's constancy, in other words, after our own death, probalby time's running must have continued forevermore, that awareness in perceptive conviction makes us irradiation back and forth, in knowing presumptive our presence's perfect nothing in everlasting time's running in duration.
In so materially instant no life attending sensitivity, our own life context and any tangible bodily physical warmth could be composed, that knowledgeable assumption could be constantly subconcsiously mobilized in life time noramlly spent time. One clearly assumed back irradiation from our own perfect absent in nothing of us, being irradiated to our own time as our consciousness followable time running in relative compareison.

This comparaison means diffrentiated time's cognition between awoken running and materially just substantially even with irrelevance with any life, only time and materila must go on in immortality at least until universe's disappearance.

At one suggestive question, obviously our usage of to one proposition, affermation and negation in usage of acceptance and denial of duality must be caused from our own death date outputting own segregation around our own cognition.

At next chance to address to this proposition, we'd grapple with this time suggested irradiation and physiolosical symmetrical cogntion around time running and time concsiousness.
(to be continued)

Jan.25th.  Apr. 5th.     2022