First, logics should not rely on only positivism.
Because positivisim is based on our thought reliable objectivism is only correct, but actually logics should  research even positivism which could be one of dogmatized idea.

And if we try to have one for the present trustworthy hypothesis, it also could be that now observably proved many materialized composition should be either the one object for assessing with skepticism.

In frank, the fact that all of the material composition and the process of its formation had already been completed at the time of the birth of the universe should also be considered as an epoch.

If upper truth could be to some extent trsutworthy, we should have some idea that universe's birth moment had only trail testing condition, and if Darwin's natural selection could be regarded one of the best trustworthy theory, nature could have tested any possibility around creating universally composed universe's material composition.
That must be one first given our creadible thinkable condition.

In other words, Darwin's natural selective working power could have been taken advantage of first premise which was set initially with minimally indespensable composite condition, nevertheless, if it(nature, otherwise, like theism, God) could have tested, materials by themselves must have been given a chance to have try and error.

And if that so surely demanded and necessary testing period must be demanded, as I claimed at a. surely it should be interpreted that first given premise must have been that any materila could not be crossed at one spatially dimensional position, location.
Yes, certainly, any material element was from the beginning progamed as now our observably proved composition, how natural selective theory could be intervened so effectively in progression to nature world?

In other words, for composing natural selective(if that theory's cardinal elemental mechanism should be treated as more universally at not only life crueture but also mineral or so), first not crossed plural presence in one location must have been set, because if from the beginning, any materially elemental compositional mechanism could have been given as the absolute premise, any natural selective necessity must have been invalidated function.

Certainly now already expired condition in which we either survive in this universe must have the impossibility that my now located position must never be simutaneously shared with your body, and that'd be so necessary.
But in initial setting, as absolute condition, if for the first moment to be given birth of this universe as being, any material could be presiously mecanically function to compose by themselves and our DNA's comosition process as evidenced Meiosis and Somatic Division, how natural selection's activating chance could have been inserted in nature phenonemon.

Though, necessarily for the first initial setting by universe's birth, the absolutely given premise as the condition that One being thing（as some meant identified substance, material) could never stay at plural locations simultaneously. Space's fundamental nature makes us aware of that we either are one part of space, and first as the premise, that mechanism must have been given, for the first time, elemental composition and any species natural selective progression could have been realized so really.

Though, my suggesting that One being thing（as some meant identified substance, material) could never stay at plural locations simultaneously. Space's fundamental nature makes us aware of that we either are one part of space must have been demanded so necessarily.

And consequently even afterward that principle ignoring all composite completion and natural selection was done in this earth, still, e.g. my sitting position must never be shared with you as your body sitting on my chair simultaneously.

Did you comprehend my a. 's interpretaion's logical mechanism.
This methodizing is not only Proof of God's Existence but also Darwin's natural selection theory's correct identity.

Though, my suggestion that One being thing（as some meant identified substance, material) could never stay at plural locations simultaneously. Space's fundamental nature makes us aware of that we either are one part of space could be given possibilty of God's initial setting and either Darwinism's grand design the most basic blueprint.

(to be continued to b.)

Apr. 13th.    2022

Appendix; My this series is based on the theory of natural selection and logical consistency rather than physicalism.