At my last days at participating in one biologically evolution theory researching academic circle, at academic meeting, we all belonging members had a social after all lecture and symposium with dinner party, I found that invited internationally famous one systematologist who came from the US was isolated at absence of conversation partner as there was at Japan, my country, I dared to ask him my usually attending one enigmatic question around our society talking frankly to him(he was 80th years old very great fame man), that content was like next.
“When we have some English conversation at each occasion of each site, for example, politician’s speech usage English, high class bureaucrats’ it, diplomats’ one, otherwise academic circle usage of it, news reporting reading it, and authors’ using own it are mutually different.”
To that my suggestion, he rapidly responded saying so passionately “Very different.” and he explained that any case must have own necessity but mutually those usage must never be easily share to each other, and that factual truth must have something so useful to consider.”

Upper exampled talking aspect or taken mode in mutual so harshly given difference means so much to us as human being society belonging individual.

Because after all, any daily our usually experiencing talking site occasion must have at each time and case so signified positioned language usage meaning.

E.g. for client to order so skillful carpainter to build our own house, that professional carpenter’s taking talking appearance or mode must be so differentiated from e.g. a lawn mouwer sales person’s it or a casher at home center’s legister or so are mutually very different ordinarily, because even at the same category of durable cunsumable goods, former is one of legacy at whole life span or so the nearest to it and latter is more easily replaceable goods for daily frequent use, though essentially at the same conversation around client and sales person.

These mutually obviously confirmable difference and almost perfectly another territory’s relevance is more remotely differentiated and spiritually distanced, e. g. sales person’s talking mode with us( necessarily our reacting and asking mode must be included) and a bill broker’s case for those are mutually moreover differentiated to each other, you know.

Necessarily at these exampled cases, we’d be able to know that there must be another very essential difference more than TPO levelled discernment abiding talking mode’s specified conversion, otherwise, mutually differentiated territorial world view must be potentially equipped at each case or occasion we can ask and react for the conversation partner’s own remark.

In fact, at these considerable reseaching issue, we’d regard them as next deliberative truth around our social reality. I’d itemize expenses.

✹1. Our daily habitual world views’ mutual gap and reaction to it are mutually irelevantly interacted.

✹2, Nevertheless, we all are usually demanded so differentiated territory easily tresspassing conversation necessity which must be mutually acknowledge mutually in difference of professionalism.

✹3. So fiercely mutually not so easily graspable difference at engaged territory must be caused from mutual daily addressing content and knowledgeable skill and habit in own bodily physiolosical tranined fruit and spiritually accepting own view to own professionalism.

Necessarily, ✹1 must be our simply daily scenery embodied social conversation mode. A
Necessarily, ✹2 must be our socially necessary mutual interaction and concern or relevance and reciprocal mutual contacting. B
Necessari;y, ✹3 must be merely our personally tangible daily habitual trained at and familiar with our mind which must intervene our truly necessary social site talk site. C

In conclusion, if we hurry at very rough conclusion for researching formalized formula or equation, like next, we’d aubmit these things as,

◎A means each citizen’s mutual gapped premised soially necessary condition nobody could evade at any typed social life.

●B means at the premised A condition, nevertheless, we must pull through A’s tiny hardship for daily our own life emobodiment.

〇C means our own personally well-known thing’s reviewed awareness around our known thing and unknown one in mutual hard tangibly gapped feeling in introspection, but with it, we can surely learn socially integrally necessary subdivided reality in which we have to pull through smartly.

A and B must be to some extent, otherwise, utterly sociological deliberative intems.
Toward them, C must be physically, physiolosical deliberative item, but simultaneously in introspective mind’s consideration, it must be either signified with or identical with metaphysical deliberative one.

And in summary, we can surely define those all procedural deliberative items’ analysis, like next, we must have one decisive suggestion around truth finding, as kind of our human totalized principle, it is “TO US, PERCEPTIVE MIND’S ACCEPTANCE must be DERIVED FROM both BODILY LEARNT DIMENSIONAL MIND’s SCHEMING and SPIRITUALLY and MENTALLY NECESSARY DAILY HABIT and CONVENTINAL SCHEMING.

Necessarily upper fomer half means ❇α PAST abiding absolutely trained PHYSICAL MEMORY at SUBCONSCIOUSNESS and latter half means ❇β PRESENCE abiding absolutely emobodied PRESENTLY PRACTICING DAILY ACTION and EXERCIZING OCCASION.

(Irregularly to be continued)

Aug. 13th. 2022

Appendix; ❇α must mean memory territorial item or issue, and ❇β must mean future prospective(perspective) territorial item in doing for next moment.
By the way, at ❇α mainly Analytical Philosophy could be utilized, and ❇β mainly Phenomenology could be done so wisely, so far.