There, we should review the relevance of substance and notion once more again.

Originally, to us, any materialized phenomenal matter could be at some ambiguity.
Because any obviously appearing phenomenal matter could be mystifying some illusionistic tricky reality, of course, being tricky is one of substantial indication.

Anyway, we should regard substance and notion in clearized relevance.
Probably, to us, substance and notion could never be decisively divisionary, because about one thing, if it'd be so obviously perfect material, on the contrary, it'd be some so illusionistically having nature to make us confirm seemingly to exist as material, but that could be illusion, in other words, mysifying so murlkily exisiting thing is one of material, just it pretends to be harder than it is, but simultaneously very stiff and rigidly perfect solid body could not be so sturdy at least at so parmanent time survival.

After all, to us, any cognition could depend on only relativity abiding own arbitrariness.

Consequently, in the context for making us convincing around difference between substance and notion must have next definitive interpretation.

❇SUBSTANCE = What we can have conviction around what it is could depend on never illusionisitc nature attending matter in cognition.

❇NOTION = What we can have some detached mindset as what could be subjectively regarded as skeptically regarding substantially can be doubted, but it'd never be perfect nothing or ultimately absence.

To some extent, this duality means only relatively convincing materialized appearance or not in difference. We could say so relatively neutrally.

One thing, we could say clearly, that at the matter of fact, to us, only very certain and never skeptically regarded object could be seen preceded substance, against it, at more divisionary affirmation and negation in dual combination abiding our cognition, at a glance, we can have substantial image or impression, nevertheless, that must be more illusionistically mystifying object, to that, we'd judge "fake", "mystification" and "fantasy", nevertheless, in fact, both real matter seen just substance and illusion must be simultaneously what our mind makes to our cogniton.

At certainty, we regard only very undoubtfully existing thing, we call it "substance".
Meanwhile, we regard only very skeptically not clearly existing thing, we call it "illusion" or "fantasy".
Nevertheless, both things must be notions.

We can confirm that we have two typed categories.

◎Substance and Notion　→　❶

◎Substance and Illusion, Fantasy　→　➋

Upper those two items for our mind's cognition could be like next.

❶　When we want to exclude only seen skeptically, not certain, in othe worlds, only uncertain thing, we want its thing and other things called "Substance and Notion" in relevance.(E.g. beforehand we start experiment) 
                                                                                BEHAVIRAL SCIENTIFIC COGNITION'S
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　ANALYTICALLY CATEGORIZABLE                                                                                                                                      NECESSITY
  
➋　When we want to regard what we can believe in strictly undoubtful one certainty, we want its thing and other things called "Substance and Illusion or Fantasy".
                                                                               OBJECTIVELY REGARDED                                                                                                 MATERIALIZED EXPRESSION'S COGNITION

Finally, next diagram must be composed.

Our Intenion, Action, Object = OIAO
Objectively Regarded Viewed Appearance = ORVA, and Action = (A)

(A) levelled mindset's Intensity abiding cognition is 

                                                                     
                                                        OIAO(A) ＞ ORVA
                                            　 at Practically objective degree  ＜kind of future prospective＞
                                                                
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　【A Posteriori's Expectation】

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　but,

                                                      ORVA ＞  OIAO(A)
                                              at Notionally introspective degeree　＜kind of recollective＞
                                                                
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　【 A Priori's Confirmation】                      

(Irregularly to be continued)

Aug. 16th.  2022