Our malevolent unconsciousness means that we tend to show ourselves more than we actually are, as is often demonstrated in joke-like content with moderate boasts that are often exchanged in informal conversations among friends. Although they can live a healthy social life as long as they do not exceed the permissible vanity of showing off well, for example, they stumble at work, etc. They easily aim for success and tend to go out of control socially and ethically by making themselves look better than necessary. This is often the case both in the working environment of bureaucrats and in the daily local election campaigns of politicians in the same constituency.

However, in essence, the most healthy self-defense is not to be brave and show off one's abilities more than necessary, but rather to naively admit one's shortcomings and avoid evil adventures as much as possible. It will be demonstrated only in the direction of making an effort to make it look like it and making it known to society.

Therefore, the most worrisome acts of vanity in society are demagogue-like insults toward others, which are often seen in our society through the use of SNS, etc. It is rooted in the uninhibited nature of mass individualist discourse toward silly agitation through derisive remarks that direct self-combat.

Modern society is full of such temptations. This is because we live in a social environment in which anyone, even amateurs, can frequently use radio technology, which was once used only for strategic military purposes.

In other words, the peculiar gentlemanly critical situation of modern society is the Gestapo mentality created by the curiosity and vanity of individuals who disclose information and take in information that has been opened to all individuals. In other words, it is in a Pandora's box of irreversibility created by the limitlessness of freedom that is too uninhibited to speak.

It can be said that the truth that an individual's unrestricted expression and freedom of communication brings to modern society is the maximum expansion of self-protection (modern people's sensibilities are already almost all citizens' espionage). The thing that has continued to fuel it is the unlimited freedom of speech in daily use of SNS).

Unrestricted free speech transmission, on the other hand, makes it possible for any individual to wear a mobile phone when going out on a daily basis, and to immediately contact the police in case of emergency. Their mutual wariness toward others fuels self-defense. In other words, psychologically, by the time modern people have already reached puberty, they have learned how to give others a spear that severely undermines social credibility. Then, everyone is aware that we are in a wireless information environment where it is easy to get addicted to having unlimited power through technology. Therefore, there is a need for social ethical considerations that are essential for radio users.

In other words, it is necessary to be more ethically and metaphysically convinced of the theory of self-responsibility. We are required to acquire ethical thoughts in the sense that we try not to unconsciously activate evil in ourselves. That's because every individual carries some sort of murder weapon. More symbolically, modern working adults have already lost their psychological naivety. It is because we have made a habit of observing all others viciously through the real image of our vicious self.

For example, our unconscious evil directed at others tends to increase the aggression of criticism unnecessarily for a single irresponsible human act. Moreover, the higher the social status of the opponent, the easier it is to justify the aggression. However, this is morally rather despisable psychology and should be restrained. This is because society as a whole is given unlimited freedom, and depending on the demagogue-like criticism of a single citizen, depending on the case, even innocent citizens can unexpectedly easily engage in free speech on SNS and their followers. This is because we are living in an era where it is not impossible to socially bury the other party by "chains of criticism and exchanges of bloodbaths" that unite.

Therefore, in an era like today when all means of communication are open to all individuals, we should be very careful with each other, understand well in advance the stupidity that unconsciously tries to create a scapegoat, and consciously suppress it. There is a need to go. Weak citizens and powerful politicians alike need to keep this in mind on a daily basis as a psychological point of caution for both those who insult and those who are abused.

Suppressing unnecessary mutually aggressive freedom, in other words, taking care not to realize our scapegoat creative society badly and easily, paying attention to each other and finding signs of it, taking care to suppress and calm down. we allI need it.

Since each individual has a certain kind of self-defense military-strategic mentality on a daily basis, it is difficult to find and find a scapegoat for any individual in terms of crowd psychology. If so, the temptation to raise that person to bloodbath, that is the very act of evil that unconsciously relies on us, but we are always careful to suppress it, and we are aware of the magnitude of the power that a single citizen can exercise. It is necessary to be self-reliant.

This attention is the greatest ethics in the modern information transmission communication society. Ethics is the retention of restraining reason against the act of unconscious evil in knowledge.

In terms of work, as mentioned in B, modern human ethics is based on the suppression of the vanity psychology that unconsciously wants to make oneself look better than it actually is, but such a vanity psychology that leads to such a daring step. There is a need to build a work environment that inhibits each other and a mental environment among like-minded clusters on the Internet. This will steer our mentality in the direction of eliminating the unfortunate victims who are driven to suicide due to internet slander and slander.
Since we are forced to open a Pandora's box by acquiring unlimited freedom of speech, it is inevitable that there will be rational wills, conscious minds, that consciously and unconsciously restrain each other's invocations of evil. should always be carried.

In order to eliminate the scapegoat damage that befalls oneself, there is no other way than to use the wireless communication environment to treat all others other than oneself with such consideration, and to maintain that lifestyle. By constantly confirming such knowledge with each other, we will create a communication environment where all citizens can refrain from creating scapegoats for others and proactively suppress each other so as not to realize unnecessary slander in advance. There is a need to.

In order to prevent this from happening, we should maintain an ethics in mind that will always eliminate as much as possible the unconscious curiosity created like a scapegoat. We must not forget the stance of maintaining a kind of fear and self-restraint reason in the environment itself where it is easy for anyone to easily realize the fictional excitement that is permitted only in hard-boiled novels for entertainment on the Internet.

In order to avoid activating the self-defensive malice of others as much as possible on a daily basis, we simply consciously show each other and constantly confirm the rationality that suppresses the scapegoat creative society. It is a matter of doing. The ethics that prevent its unconscious realization must be kept in mind by all participants in the communication and information transmission society.

It is nothing less than a conscious collective responsibility top priority inherent in the conquered era of the modern communication environment. In other words, it boils down to suppressing overconfidence in one's own abilities (but it's surprisingly difficult to do so if one becomes absorbed in using the communication environment. This is the biggest psychological problem of modern people, This unconscious suppression is an urgent need for modern people.)

We should know that overcoming our own vanity is harder than we expected, and we should always keep that in mind.

In other words, we will recognize the act of self-defensive evil caused by the self-defense of others, that is, the act of self-defensive evil that can be unconsciously exerted by anyone, as a truth, and develop a social environment for transmission of communication information that can prevent it from occurring. there is a need.
The moment when others in general are likely to invoke self-defensive evil is simply the moment when they mutually seek scapegoats. This is the basic behavioral element of mob stupidity, the greatest evil.

Therefore, it is necessary to always consciously and self-restraint to eradicate the signs of scapegoating specific others. If we can share a mutual restraint against the activation of the evil side, it is actually possible for us to curb the damage caused by the Internet. It is something that can be consciously prevented by maintaining one's integrity. Everyone knows that we live in an age where we need ethics to curb and refrain from sending out bad information in an addictive internet environment. Therefore, everyone already knows that it is a matter of individual consciousness. It is meaningful to make it a wave of information dissemination society by realizing it.

Rather, if it is done collectively, it becomes a kind of Gestapo. Therefore, it is an ethics that is planted in the deep psychology of individuals.

Although this series will end on its own for the time being, we will likely have the opportunity to explore the ethical propositions of modern information dissemination society in a different form and in a logical construction. And it goes without saying that it is important for us to be familiar with our mentally or, only curiously sexually malignant nature. This is because unconsciously motivated sexual malignancy is nothing more than an unconscious activation of the arbitrary creation of a self-defensive scapegoat that is unnecessarily excessively expressed within a group, rather than an individual tendency. This is an example of our awareness of the issues that arise from a social situation in which true individualism is unexpectedly difficult to achieve.

[Temporarily finished] Consideration is required again.