In frank, academic circle's each professional's genre's diversity or infinetely subdivided reality by itself shows and proves that at least any researching one has a conviction that nobody knows and analyzes only correct truth at a stretch.

Though, each subdivided academic genre's number must only increse, far from it, it'd never decrease, only the truth must never switched by itself.

Phylogenetics must have own macro watching outputting own looking over and micro viewing's incompatibility. 

Though, necessarily its notice must generate Cladistis as genre for knowing nature's feature classifying term and principle's comprehension around evolusive divergence or divergent provable reason and trustworthy principle.

And it now applies ordinarily Maximum Parsimony （refer the term's Wikipedia).

By the way, Phenetics is defined like next at least at Wikipedia.

                

                   

                        ❇️     ❇️     ❇️     ❇️    ❇️

Phenetics; In biology, phenetics（Greek; Phainein to appear) f/Inεtlks, also known as taximetsics, is an attempt to classify organisms based on overall similarity, usually in morphology or other observable traits, regardless of their phylogeny or evolutionary relation.

It is closely related to numerical taxonomy which is concerned with the use of numerical methods for taxonomic classification. Many people contributed to the development of phenetics, but the most influential were Peter Meath and Robert R.Sokal.

Their books are still primary references for this sub-discipline, although now out of print 

[1] Sneathw. P.H.A.& R.R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomygーThe principles, and practical of numerical classification.                           

Phenetics has largely been superseded by cladistics for research into evolutionary relationships among species.

However, certain phenetic wmd-methods （such as B aysian influence) are too computationally expensive.

Phenetic techniques include various forms of clustering and ordination.

These are sophisticated ways of refucing the variation displayed by organisms to manageable level. In practice, this means measuring dozens of variables, and then presenting them as two-or three-dimensional graphs. Much of the technical challenge in phenetics revolves around balancing the loss of information in such a reduction against the ease of interpreting the resulting graphs.

The method can be traced to 1763 and Michael Adanson(in his familles des principleーoverall similarity and equal weighingーand modern phenetics are sometimes called neo-Adansonianism. 🔯

🔯 Michael Adanson(1727 4/7 -  1806 8/3)

French naturalist. About 4years, stayed in Senegal.

                       ❇️     ❇️     ❇️    ❇️     ❇️

Then, at thad matter of fact, one very famous N obel praise laureate scientist as researcher mentioned. 

"Basic (fundamental) research and applied research

should be decided, so as to say, the one's remark could be applied here, how should regard 'invention'?

In fact, to us, invented technology mus have changed our life spending mode so drastically.

Though necessarily, that invented idea and practical convenience which is executed in socially interlocked realities.

However, certainly, either creativity is demanded in Art, Literature, Music, Movie, Theatre drama playing or so  But probably each circle must have own reason to demand creativity.

The circumstanced gap means kind of necessity around what each scientific circle needs to discriminate basic resarch and applied one.

However, at least at Taxonomy, natural history or so, how we should regard basic research and applied one in discrimination?

From the beginning, not like physics, chemistry, otherwise physiology, neurology or so, natural history or taxonomy abiding intelligence means from the beginning perfectly basic classification, but just its "classification" could be both basic research and applied one.

Because originally,  dividing base and application must consist in already practically necessity proved own socially given consensus.

Though necessarily, researching and analyzing in never divisional cognitive mindset and readiness must be demanded there.

On the other hand, from the beginning, around biology or ecology abiding academic circle's reason to exist, originally and from the beginning, basic and applied in no clarified discriminated category must be there as the intrinsic. Because classification and categorizing mean one of our mind's intrinsically equipped one consciousness abiding cognition. That nature is obviously gapped between researched objects divided in subdivision dragged, subdivisible practically dividable necessity.

In other words, easily divisional subdivided cognitive genre academic circle must have from the beginning socially demanded aim and reached object.

Meanwhile, Biology, Ecology, or philosophy, Rhetric, Ethology, Ethics, Psychology, Psychiatric or so are never so. Linguistics, Anthropology, Sociology, Mythology are either so. Necessarily Mathematics and Logics either.(to us, necessarily at being engaged in these, we have mother language and professional academician abiding ones with Latin, Greek, and globally English. And that ambivalence is shared with also Biology, because we are both one of all species and we are own specified prerence as language activity abiding own presence. Meantime, Pathology is this term so ambivalent at any term's relevance.)

By the way, those categorized ideas and interpreting are already Taxonomic approaches.

Everything is returning to the starting point.

Next occasion, we should deliberate how we should only science demanded own practice abiding reason.

And how is it identified with, otherwise divisionally categorized with Logics, Phhlosophy.

(Irregularly continued)

Oct. 7,  13th.  2022