Air must diffuse to larger extent. But what does it never shrunk to smaller extent?

What makes everything so only diffused to larger extent? That emigmatic thing could never be questioned at physics.

But how does it make us so?

To my simple question, how does someone reply and give the appropriate answer to me?

In other words, what makes so contradictory around entropy decreasing costs so much and on the contradictory entropy's increasing is easy to do but also consumptive, and that means forsaking merely endurance and reducing suppressive power.

And what we'd never ask so is simply, we are surviving only in world in which any questioning I now tried must be denied by some "commonsense".

For the first premise, what space could have e.g. seen for the present infinitely diffusable extent?

That question must be prohibited by science.

In other words, science thing is composed with that decisive premise.

And to that so simple question, in world only music could be seen capable for expressing so easily and art could never be engaged so easily, so to me, felt.

WHAT MAKES SPACE BY ITSELF MAKE IT ENTROPY ONLY ENLARGED, WHAT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE AT BEING NECESSARILY DECREASED?

TO MY SIMPLE QUESTION, ANY CONVINCING ANSWER IS PREPARED FOR, ABSOLUTELY, AT THE PREMISE, SCIENCE THING IS COMPOSED.

(IRREGULARLY CONTINUED)

May. 1st.  2023

Appendix; We can know that we could never go back to any past, but we can easily remember any past thing, by the way, is it so surely so?

By the way, this notice is seen similar with space and entropy issue at least to me, but yet to me, never so rationally explainable.