To what we can confirm easily, we can never react so amazed, so palpitated mind in general at our daily days. And actually, conceptually to us, infinity is not that troublesome item for comprehending. But on the other hand, if we try to grasp so concrete and practically comprehensive picture around that infinity, we are having some complicated and so some unidentified own questionable impression in mind. 

On the other hand, when we calculate income and expenditure settlement outcome, we usually are not that having mazed mind nor so except that calculating procedure attends some own trouble. And in general, what we can output calculated consequence must be the relatively comprehensive measurable items or what (kind of) concretely relative comprehension must be made. Though obviously precise data outputted items are in general only relative grasp or kind of relativity measurable items, we could define so relatively confidently. 

Nevertheless, if we accidentally have necessity around debating God or "Infinity", we suddenly have some own precipitated mind or spiritually feeling or mentality, you know, because these items are never daily practical measurable ones. 

In frank, measurable matters are all in general completely relative things. Because its totality must be grasped and outputted with very precise data and reason for evidencing, in other words those items are wholly in general very ordinary relative items. 
On the other hand, God and "Infinity" must have own measurable and own unidentified elements which come up with suddenly to our mind. Though those unmeasurable items are never daily notion nor ordinary grasping items. Only very exceptional not relative, though very exceptional "Abstract" notions. 

By the way, "Abstract notions" are but havre ambiguous items, far from it, those "Infinity" and God are never so ambiguous, but merely not so practically daily items, though necessarily those are never so easily grasped so immediately, you know. 

In other words, except by itself, never having any relatively compared objects the conditioned presence, metaphysically only God, physically only "Infinity". Approximately we can grasp at totalled comprehension around our at least known items.

Though, if we have so strong minded own question, as not that easily well understood nor acceptably impressed thing, some very strong denial, rejection, declining mind, and refusal around accepting those must attending in our mind. And those are categorized in obviously comprehensive normal matters as own relative nature attended items. 

On the other hand from the beginning, relative interpreting and comprehension can be rejected, that territory must be existent, those included certainly ethically, metaphysically God and physically "Infinity" we can define so, necessarily. 

And that unidentified things encounter attending our mind is the strongest for impressing our own mind, you know. That is as well as the most lovable lover encountering. 

To us, the most impressive encountering must be lover or so and very unidentified or the matter which rejects our own easily understandable mind as not that easily positively affirmative things with very bad items and very miraculous ideas and encounters like religiously enlightened ideas and encounter to those. 

If we can define the most definitive thing, it must be not so ordinarily rejecting any general understanding, those items with God and "Infinity". 

To some very obvious items as theory, truth, or do, we for the time being set like next mental diagram. If ordinarily interpretable items are in front of our eyes, we can have to it, ( if ordinarily comprehended item could be "O", we all are surrounded many "O" s. 

On the other hand, very exceptional encounter we could meet by chance, that must be like next, if our mind could be "M", and not that ordinarily comprehensive item could be ¬ "O", 

"O" ⇦ M / ¬ "O"

And to us, not ordinary things must be the most impressively recollective items. 

And its intrinsic essence is belonging to so strong instinctively denying minded for the first meeting, because we in general ordinarily are managed by very carnal ideas and notions, though we have, physiologically for the first time, denial reaction. And to it, in some enough terms passed at our daily reality, we could gradually accept it and in the end, it became true religion and own philosophy. And if those process could never have passed around something, it is never so mindfully integral or revolutionary minded encounter never as well as St. Paul's conversion, from not that stated his life days. 

With those all deductively outputted principles, we can define like next.

To us, the most strongly impressing items are never so easily comprehensive nor calucukated items. That must be so exceptionally enlightened items. And at the first stage we are encountering those, ordinarily we are apt to attend strong denial reaction to those. 

Though necessarily, only to those very so exceptional items, we have the strongest impression. Those acceptance must be over ordinary comprehending mind. And if the minded stated time could never come to us, the experience is utterly only commonplace and ordinary daily experience. 

Though the strongest impressive item is not that ordinarily known things nor items.
If those could be define "O", all those are merely relative, never absolute, and necessarily never ordinary, common place items are never relative. Because those are absolute. And to it, suppositively we define "S",  that encounter must be ordinarily mixed in only junks or ordinarily common place things. 

As 

    "O" ｜" S " ｜"O" 

Though as we can deduce the presence as definitive analysis, it must for the first time seduces us strong denial. That could be S ¬, 

 For our first stage at encountering it, 

 S ¬ , but afterward, gradually that encounter significance emerges into our deeply minded idea. 

Though, 

( "O" ｜" S " ｜ "O" ) ⇨ S ¬ 

And afterward, gradually it became not that thing. 

Though, that transition must be like next. In the end, our mindful belief could be "B", 

S ¬ ⇨ ¬ ⇨ ¬ ( ¬ ) ⇨ "B"

In final, we can have some religion so strongly, and it must be fixed at our own mind. 

Upper those four steps must be necessary to us as awakening to any truth. Because to us, truly significant truth must have those four steps gradually transitional process. 

(Irregularly continued)

Nov.  11th.     2023

Appendix; This logically analyzable approach is defined as mind enlightened decision, religious minded obtaining or kind of own life philosophy acquistion in miraculous idea enlightenement and philosophic mindful fixation.